From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756528AbYFPTRv (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:17:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753355AbYFPTRn (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:17:43 -0400 Received: from viefep20-int.chello.at ([62.179.121.40]:41056 "EHLO viefep20-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753223AbYFPTRm (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:17:42 -0400 Subject: Re: [sched-devel, patch-rfc] rework of "prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones" From: Peter Zijlstra To: Dmitry Adamushko Cc: Gregory Haskins , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1213138710.26530.51.camel@earth> <1213174382.31518.69.camel@twins> <48563FDB.BA47.005A.0@novell.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:17:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1213643862.16944.142.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 19:59 +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > One way or another, we have different aritifacts (and mine have likely > more) but conceptually, both "violates" POSIX if a strict round-robin > scheduling is required. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_08.html#tag_02_08_04_01 Is quite strict on what FIFO should do, and I know of two points where we deviate and should work to match.