From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] sched: rt: dont stop the period timer when there are tasks wanting to run
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:16:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1213906578.3223.113.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <485ABD3A.9090704@uw.no>
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 20:10 +0000, Daniel K. wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > When a runnable group failed to get any runtime within a period it would be
> > found idle and the period timer would be stopped.
> >
> > So if the group ever gets throttled, it will never wake up again.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> > Reported-by: "Daniel K." <dk@uw.no>
> Tested-by: Daniel K. <dk@uw.no>
>
> I think this should go into .26 as well, due to the non-intuitiveness
> of the knobs that cause this if they are fiddled with in the wrong way.
Sounds reasonable, Ingo?
> > ---
> > kernel/sched_rt.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_rt.c
> > @@ -408,7 +408,8 @@ static int do_sched_rt_period_timer(stru
> > if (rt_rq->rt_time || rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
> > idle = 0;
> > spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
> > - }
> > + } else if (rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
> > + idle = 0;
> >
> > if (enqueue)
> > sched_rt_rq_enqueue(rt_rq);
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-19 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-19 12:22 [PATCH 00/10] sched: rt bandwidth/group fixes Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 01/10] sched: NULL pointer dereference while setting sched_rt_period_us Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 02/10] sched: rt-group: fix hierarchy Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 03/10] sched: rt-group: heirarchy aware throttle Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 04/10] sched: rt-group: fix RR buglet Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] sched: rt-bandwidth: fix cpu-hotplug interaction Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] sched: debug: add some rt debug output Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 07/10] sched: rt: fix SMP bandwidth balancing for throttled groups Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 08/10] sched: rt: move some code around Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 09/10] sched: rt: fix the bandwidth contraint computations Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 10/10] sched: rt: dont stop the period timer when there are tasks wanting to run Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-19 20:10 ` Daniel K.
2008-06-19 20:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-06-20 9:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-20 8:47 ` [PATCH 00/10] sched: rt bandwidth/group fixes Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1213906578.3223.113.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dk@uw.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome