From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753484AbYF0QWs (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:22:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757392AbYF0QV5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:21:57 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:34928 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756349AbYF0QV4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:21:56 -0400 Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] integrity From: Mimi Zohar To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Safford , Serge Hallyn , Reiner Sailer , Mimi Zohar Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:21:50 -0400 Message-Id: <1214583710.28077.13.camel@new-host.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is a request for comments for a redesign of the integrity patches. This patchset contains 5 patches. Patch 1/5 integrity: TPM cleanup (scripts/Lindent and other) Patch 2/5 integrity: TPM internal kernel interface Patch 3/5 integrity: special fs magic Patch 4/5 integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM) Patch 5/5 integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider Attached to this patchset thread is an IMA LTP patch, which tests adding file integrity measurements, replacing the default integrity measurement policy with an LSM constrained policy, and adding memory integrity measurements, using the example kmem-template. Mimi Zohar