mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <cate@debian.org>,
	Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
	Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Selbak,
	Rolla N" <rolla.n.selbak@intel.com>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Intel Microcode loader, tg3 driver, and the -rc8-mmotd New World Order firmware...
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:54:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215100465.10393.585.camel@pmac.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080703065630.2aefc930@infradead.org>

On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 06:56 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:24:34 +0200
> "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <cate@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > There are two format of Intel CPU microcode and two methods to load
> > it.
> > - old: the microcodes are in a big file, which include multiple
> >    microcodes (for multiple CPU).  The driver require a char device
> >    and a user space loader ("microcode_ctl")
> > - new: one microcode per file, using the 'request_firmware'
> >    infrastructure. No user space support needed.

Actually there are three:

1. The text format 'microcode.dat', including updates for all CPUs.
2. The binary format output by microcode_ctl, still including all CPUs.
3. The smaller files with just the relevant subset of #2.

The kernel (since 2006) can actually take either #2 or #3. The udev
scripts I just posted will use microcode_ctl to feed it #2, when they
find #1 on the file system.

A small amount of extra work in the userspace tool would let those udev
scripts feed #3 to the kernel, and then the code in the kernel to select
the appropriate update could be removed.

> > Actually Intel provides only the old methods.
> > There was talks with Arjan and Intel about the distribution format
> > for the new methods. But I don't have any new.
> > I think that when the new format is fully specified (directory
> > structure, tar, gzip,...) Intel will distribute the microcodes
> > in the new form.

Doesn't the "new format" (#3) involve hard links too, since there are
some cases where the same microcode update applies to more than one CPU
revision?

> we hope to switch to the new form but there's the small case of
> "installed base" using ancient kernels, and it's kind of not nice to
> have to release 2 sets. At some point we will switch over though.

Do we really need to _ship_ it in a different form? It's not exactly
hard to convert from the text form (#1) to either of the other two --
either on the fly in udev scripts, or at installation time.

-- 
dwmw2


  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-03 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-03  1:32 Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03  1:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-03  6:17 ` Tigran Aivazian
2008-07-03  6:35   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03  6:44     ` Tigran Aivazian
2008-07-03  9:23       ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 10:17         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03 10:30           ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 11:34             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03 12:21               ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 12:41                 ` Kay Sievers
2008-07-03 12:45                   ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 13:03                     ` Kay Sievers
2008-07-03 13:26                       ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 13:54                       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03 15:23                         ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 13:48                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03 10:22         ` Kay Sievers
2008-07-03 10:42           ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 11:32             ` Kay Sievers
2008-07-03  9:24       ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
2008-07-03 13:56         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-03 15:54           ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2008-07-03 16:22             ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1215100465.10393.585.camel@pmac.infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=cate@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rolla.n.selbak@intel.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®