From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <cate@debian.org>,
Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Selbak,
Rolla N" <rolla.n.selbak@intel.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Intel Microcode loader, tg3 driver, and the -rc8-mmotd New World Order firmware...
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:54:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1215100465.10393.585.camel@pmac.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080703065630.2aefc930@infradead.org>
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 06:56 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:24:34 +0200
> "Giacomo A. Catenazzi" <cate@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > There are two format of Intel CPU microcode and two methods to load
> > it.
> > - old: the microcodes are in a big file, which include multiple
> > microcodes (for multiple CPU). The driver require a char device
> > and a user space loader ("microcode_ctl")
> > - new: one microcode per file, using the 'request_firmware'
> > infrastructure. No user space support needed.
Actually there are three:
1. The text format 'microcode.dat', including updates for all CPUs.
2. The binary format output by microcode_ctl, still including all CPUs.
3. The smaller files with just the relevant subset of #2.
The kernel (since 2006) can actually take either #2 or #3. The udev
scripts I just posted will use microcode_ctl to feed it #2, when they
find #1 on the file system.
A small amount of extra work in the userspace tool would let those udev
scripts feed #3 to the kernel, and then the code in the kernel to select
the appropriate update could be removed.
> > Actually Intel provides only the old methods.
> > There was talks with Arjan and Intel about the distribution format
> > for the new methods. But I don't have any new.
> > I think that when the new format is fully specified (directory
> > structure, tar, gzip,...) Intel will distribute the microcodes
> > in the new form.
Doesn't the "new format" (#3) involve hard links too, since there are
some cases where the same microcode update applies to more than one CPU
revision?
> we hope to switch to the new form but there's the small case of
> "installed base" using ancient kernels, and it's kind of not nice to
> have to release 2 sets. At some point we will switch over though.
Do we really need to _ship_ it in a different form? It's not exactly
hard to convert from the text form (#1) to either of the other two --
either on the fly in udev scripts, or at installation time.
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-03 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-03 1:32 Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03 1:43 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-03 6:17 ` Tigran Aivazian
2008-07-03 6:35 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03 6:44 ` Tigran Aivazian
2008-07-03 9:23 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 10:17 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03 10:30 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 11:34 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03 12:21 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 12:41 ` Kay Sievers
2008-07-03 12:45 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 13:03 ` Kay Sievers
2008-07-03 13:26 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 13:54 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03 15:23 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 13:48 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-07-03 10:22 ` Kay Sievers
2008-07-03 10:42 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-03 11:32 ` Kay Sievers
2008-07-03 9:24 ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
2008-07-03 13:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-07-03 15:54 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2008-07-03 16:22 ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1215100465.10393.585.camel@pmac.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=cate@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rolla.n.selbak@intel.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®