mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	rth@twiddle.net, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, hskinnemoen@atmel.com,
	cooloney@kernel.org, starvik@axis.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, tony.luck@intel.com,
	takata@linux-m32r.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	matthew@wil.cx, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, lethal@linux-sh.org,
	chris@zankel.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introducing asm/syscalls.h
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:05:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216580711.2475.175.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1216544940.12650.13.camel@jaswinder.satnam>

On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 14:39 +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> 
> Declaring arch-dependent syscalls for all architectures
> Beneficial for kernel and userspace

Not really beneficial for userspace at all. Don't expose it.

I'm a little dubious about touching all architectures at once.

It might be nicer to do a first patch which adds an _empty_
<asm/syscalls.h> on each platform, and includes that from
<linux/syscalls.h>. And then follow up with one patch per architecture.

Have you compile-tested them all?

-- 
dwmw2


      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-20 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-20  9:09 Jaswinder Singh
2008-07-20 10:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-07-20 12:17   ` Jaswinder Singh
2008-07-20 13:06     ` Jaswinder Singh
2008-07-20 13:17     ` Ralf Baechle
2008-07-20 13:24       ` Jaswinder Singh
2008-07-20 19:05 ` David Woodhouse [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1216580711.2475.175.camel@shinybook.infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=cooloney@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
    --cc=jaswinder@infradead.org \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=starvik@axis.com \
    --cc=takata@linux-m32r.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®