From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: Karsten Keil <kkeil@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mISDN cleanup user interface
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:13:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217409211.27925.177.camel@pmac.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1217365330.417.8.camel@californication>
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 23:02 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> > > Please pull from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kkeil/ISDN-2.6.git master
> > >
> > > The channelmap should have the same size on 32 and 64 bit
> > > systems. Thanks to David Woodhouse for spotting this.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Karsten Keil <kkeil@suse.de>
> >
> > Er, isn't that still broken? Consider 32-bit userspace on 64-bit kernel,
> > big-endian.
>
> I agree with David here. Please lets not do these horribly things again.
> Almost everybody has done their fair share of brokenness with the compat
> layers. Especially 32-bit userspace on 64-bit kernels. Using __u32 and
> alike is a way better choice and less headache.
Well, he's already switched to a 32-bit type, which is fine in that
respect -- at least the struct is the same _size_ on 32-bit and 64-bit
targets now. (OK, so inventing new types like 'u_int' instead of just
using the ones that the C language provides is a bit silly, but that's
the Linux norm so I wasn't complaining about that.)
But the channelmap field is still broken because it's using set_bit() on
int types, and they're defined to work on unsigned long. So in the
fairly common case where a BRI driver sets bits 1 and 2 (sic) in the
channel map, that will look like this on a 64-bit big-endian kernel:
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
(unsigned long #1) (unsigned long #2)
When 32-bit userspace receives that, it'll see this:
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
(word #1) (word #2) (word #3) (word #4)
.. in which it's bits 33 and 34 that are set. So the new version in the
patch to which I replied _still_ needs a compat routine.
You might get away with it if you use set_le_bit() though.
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-30 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-29 19:56 Karsten Keil
2008-07-29 20:22 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-29 21:02 ` Marcel Holtmann
2008-07-30 9:13 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2008-07-30 16:33 ` Karsten Keil
2008-07-30 16:57 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-30 17:51 ` Karsten Keil
2008-07-30 18:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-07-30 18:46 ` Karsten Keil
2008-07-30 19:08 ` David Woodhouse
2008-07-30 15:08 ` Karsten Keil
2008-08-01 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-02 15:21 ` Karsten Keil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1217409211.27925.177.camel@pmac.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=kkeil@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®