From: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] x86: Separate generic cpu disabling code from APIC writes in cpu_disable
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:04:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219341888-23191-6-git-send-email-alex.nixon@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1219341888-23191-5-git-send-email-alex.nixon@citrix.com>
It allows paravirt implementations of cpu_disable to share the cpu_disable_common code, without having to take on board APIC writes, which may not be appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
include/asm-x86/smp.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 83e9591..ccb3b12 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1340,25 +1340,9 @@ static void __ref remove_cpu_from_maps(int cpu)
numa_remove_cpu(cpu);
}
-int native_cpu_disable(void)
+void cpu_disable_common(void)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
- /*
- * Perhaps use cpufreq to drop frequency, but that could go
- * into generic code.
- *
- * We won't take down the boot processor on i386 due to some
- * interrupts only being able to be serviced by the BSP.
- * Especially so if we're not using an IOAPIC -zwane
- */
- if (cpu == 0)
- return -EBUSY;
-
- if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_LOCAL_APIC)
- stop_apic_nmi_watchdog(NULL);
- clear_local_APIC();
-
/*
* HACK:
* Allow any queued timer interrupts to get serviced
@@ -1376,6 +1360,28 @@ int native_cpu_disable(void)
remove_cpu_from_maps(cpu);
unlock_vector_lock();
fixup_irqs(cpu_online_map);
+}
+
+int native_cpu_disable(void)
+{
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
+ /*
+ * Perhaps use cpufreq to drop frequency, but that could go
+ * into generic code.
+ *
+ * We won't take down the boot processor on i386 due to some
+ * interrupts only being able to be serviced by the BSP.
+ * Especially so if we're not using an IOAPIC -zwane
+ */
+ if (cpu == 0)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_LOCAL_APIC)
+ stop_apic_nmi_watchdog(NULL);
+ clear_local_APIC();
+
+ cpu_disable_common();
return 0;
}
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/smp.h b/include/asm-x86/smp.h
index fd2a070..bff3fa6 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/smp.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/smp.h
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static inline void arch_send_call_function_ipi(cpumask_t mask)
smp_ops.send_call_func_ipi(mask);
}
+void cpu_disable_common(void);
void native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void);
void native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus);
void native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus);
--
1.5.4.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-21 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-21 18:04 [PATCH 1/7] x86/paravirt: Add hooks for CPU hotplugging Alex Nixon
2008-08-21 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt hook for wbinvd_halt Alex Nixon
2008-08-21 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] Xen: Add Xen implementation of wbinvd_halt Alex Nixon
2008-08-21 18:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86_32: Clean up play_dead Alex Nixon
2008-08-21 18:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: Unify x86_32 and x86_64 play_dead into one function Alex Nixon
2008-08-21 18:04 ` Alex Nixon [this message]
2008-08-21 18:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] Xen: Implement CPU hotplugging Alex Nixon
2008-08-21 18:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-21 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/paravirt: Add paravirt hook for wbinvd_halt Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-21 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/paravirt: Add hooks for CPU hotplugging Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219341888-23191-6-git-send-email-alex.nixon@citrix.com \
--to=alex.nixon@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®