From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ewsoutbound.kpnmail.nl (ewsoutbound.kpnmail.nl [195.121.94.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E23F30674D for ; Thu, 21 May 2026 13:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.121.94.183 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779371888; cv=none; b=ta8li0HhQWri4O+dvtInfLK8pYo56IkxszIV0GXROf2+E9GIEuo6qDrcKyiqgvzt/5UOVcvtC/XaMKd3Mx8FdcJU5kwSzejGNFyo9dSLxTQ5w6P4NVdsjjAqDfmNl1U845x9gn0BEBCUnAXEjeBW65tdZ9FCCuXwORiSlkVVWwc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779371888; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hO72YV0VNE8gvnRBKGt741B/UG83HuEK25KL+4h+QJQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mc9HlrZgGb+xkGuvOMvVfk5DtgjRswca0BYqwNhXkxQQe4180CTMrdI0TQHQ63JbZl/kMcrSef2LBuxErLCQ+LtMztJ5+30nktNd6i3UAcbiRO0VK3rEfP7e3LW8FGqTsVR+48yFtGGOeMqIomjoSgyIQNXyV3WPHti7LPvXRt0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xs4all.nl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xs4all.nl; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=xs4all.nl header.i=@xs4all.nl header.b=QzKO51yJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.121.94.183 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xs4all.nl Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xs4all.nl Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=xs4all.nl header.i=@xs4all.nl header.b="QzKO51yJ" X-KPN-MessageId: 1707d14c-551d-11f1-bea8-005056992ed3 Received: from mta.kpnmail.nl (unknown [10.31.161.191]) by ewsoutbound.so.kpn.org (Halon) with ESMTPS id 1707d14c-551d-11f1-bea8-005056992ed3; Thu, 21 May 2026 15:58:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mtaoutbound.kpnmail.nl (unknown [10.128.135.190]) by mta.kpnmail.nl (Halon) with ESMTP id 170675de-551d-11f1-83d9-00505699891e; Thu, 21 May 2026 15:58:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xs4all.nl; s=xs4all01; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:message-id:to:from:date; bh=rt/+pazRkp9cgn9OOJy0OdEhNxBfkh0UOfm+VW1aUoI=; b=QzKO51yJ//38R3jnblcMXQ6x3UeMtWS2m52A4Cq0fFxOS0QYCqv/o8F8cRY6uRMhUY6xLxjuueF9l n/PtSSsJaEVJlGilwlMqjIQccCy4HEF8nU3Ppkr9qpVuIL+l7vdPUPpw92e4m+B+kWLByF4ZgFcmTr 9xtR7a1loRY+2lw9vvJNF0Lica18IH8sBiDX8nuwU5uibe5is99xmbtQzxvrGHMgz+iFK173wBAbjw eLVHwlkRicgGRnsc4jJZZj+xhhAnRuahG1CheWjYA4ZB3mZw85RooSrzERaHo9ZyRtsZH+Lrq/dxL+ GwfwLil1UWcdNOICaJBHkcT6ZDCbAJA== X-KPN-MID: 33|N5DBCoXt0IafZ9nOP7k/KaJsS6rt82WMamDiH1eoCCi6x8Q2FlwWCQ5ZqU77kmt gMO9lABwoHi8Io8d7k6TnIwgPmTBNDbS7uAP1ALNRL4U= X-CMASSUN: 33|VP35nPIIzk7IiwuYN3ZQxGp6urWcNppG1hqbT6tDJO1LFwkNzobU1UVKVQlH9pi w6bsnYQj2B4i+7Nysqf1rtA== X-KPN-VerifiedSender: Yes Received: from cpxoxapps-mh02 (cpxoxapps-mh02.personalcloud.so.kpn.org [10.128.135.208]) by mtaoutbound.kpnmail.nl (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 16f69902-551d-11f1-b8d7-005056995d6c; Thu, 21 May 2026 15:58:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 15:58:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Jori Koolstra To: Mark Brown Cc: Dorjoy Chowdhury , Christian Brauner , Jeff Layton , Aleksa Sarai , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Message-ID: <12198575.2129298.1779371885282@kpc.webmail.kpnmail.nl> In-Reply-To: <4bd253fa-c363-43cb-adaa-0248ac707a0d@sirena.org.uk> References: <1286370201.1726989.1779131564699@kpc.webmail.kpnmail.nl> <4bd253fa-c363-43cb-adaa-0248ac707a0d@sirena.org.uk> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal > Op 19-05-2026 18:24 CEST schreef Mark Brown : > > > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 09:12:44PM +0200, Jori Koolstra wrote: > > > Op 18-05-2026 19:13 CEST schreef Mark Brown : > > > > Figured it'd be an arch specific version of a similar thing - I didn't > > > audit them as you can see. > > > These confusions with octal numbers in lists that aren't even ordered is > > why I would prefer to use shifted values instead. I don't see any reason > > actually why we should not just convert them all, apart from churning and > > perhaps not doing it correctly (which would be bad). My rationale for mixing > > was to use 1 << n at least for the remaining bits. If I remember correctly, > > this is also what Aleksa preferred. > > Yeah, shifted values do make sense to me as well - other than the > inconsistent style the only issue I saw was that it's a bit less obvious > that the values collide. Yeah, that's unfortunate. @Christian, can we get rid of these octal values? Or is that too much churn?