From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rtw-next v4 4/4] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Split rtw_sdio_rx_isr into 8051 and 3081 variants
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 02:08:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <121a23706c144a898e71441ed89c3cb3@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005084849.3109337-5-alastair@d-silva.org>
Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org> wrote:
> Split rtw_sdio_rx_isr() into separate 8051 and 3081 variants to be
> clear. The two differences between the architectures are:
> - Register size: REG_SDIO_RX0_REQ_LEN is 16-bit on 8051, 32-bit on 3081.
> - HISR behavior: 8051 re-reads REG_SDIO_HISR on each iteration, while
> 3081 drains based on rx_len without re-reading HISR.
>
> This is a refactoring without any logic changes.
>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
[...]
> + /* Stop if no more RX requests are pending, even if
nit: keep first line of block comment as empty.
> + * rx_len could be greater than zero in the next
> + * iteration. This is needed because the RX buffer may
> + * already contain data while either HW or FW are not
> + * done filling that buffer yet. Still reading the
> + * buffer can result in packets where
> + * rtw_rx_pkt_stat.pkt_len is zero or points beyond the
> + * end of the buffer.
> + */
> + hisr = rtw_read32(rtwdev, REG_SDIO_HISR);
> } while (total_rx_bytes < SZ_64K && hisr & REG_SDIO_HISR_RX_REQUEST);
> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 8:48 [PATCH rtw-next v4 0/4] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Fix unhandled RX request interrupt storm Alastair D'Silva
2026-10-05 8:48 ` [PATCH rtw-next v4 1/4] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Handle allocation and read errors in rtw_sdio_rxfifo_recv Alastair D'Silva
2026-10-06 1:35 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-10-05 8:48 ` [PATCH rtw-next v4 2/4] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Track running state and cancel TX worker on stop Alastair D'Silva
2026-10-06 2:03 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-10-06 4:44 ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-05 8:48 ` [PATCH rtw-next v4 3/4] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Fix unhandled RX request interrupt storm Alastair D'Silva
2026-10-06 2:05 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-10-05 8:48 ` [PATCH rtw-next v4 4/4] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Split rtw_sdio_rx_isr into 8051 and 3081 variants Alastair D'Silva
2026-10-06 2:08 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=121a23706c144a898e71441ed89c3cb3@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=alastair@d-silva.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®