From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Misc fixes for 2.6.27
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:23:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220343790.2982.165.camel@pmac.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080902061920.GK18288@one.firstfloor.org>
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 08:19 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 04:16:39PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:01:19 +0200
> > Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:32:16 +0200
> > > > Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> writes:
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > +static struct dmi_system_id __initdata intel_iommu_dmi_table[]
> > > >> > = {
> > > >> > + { /* Some DG33BU BIOS revisions advertised
> > > >> > non-existent VT-d */
> > > >>
> > > >> Are you sure it's non existent? A G33 chipset should have it in
> > > >> hardware I thought.
> > > >
> > > > nope they don't/
> > > > later ones and some other models do though, but not the G33
> > >
> > > I see. But presumably that chipset will be in other motherboards
> > > too and that BIOS bug might be also wider spread. So it would be
> > > still better to key off an PCI-ID or similar.
It's certainly possible that the same BIOS bug could show up elsewhere.
I was expecting that we could add new motherboards to the DMI table if
that happens.
> > it would be nice, no doubt, unfortunately this code runs (and needs to
> > run) before the PCI subsystem is initialized...
>
> early quirks handles these cases. Check out early-quirks.c
That might work, I suppose -- although the iommu probe happens early, it
looks like the early-quirks are handled even earlier. Unfortunately the
last attempt at flashing a BIOS on my DG33BU has turned it into a brick
and even the recovery procedure doesn't work, so I can't test any more
-- I'm more inclined to stick with what I'd tested, but if you feel
strongly and someone can test this version, then perhaps we could go
with that instead...
I made it check for this:
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express DRAM Controller [8086:29c0] (rev 02)
Are we sure that device never going to appear on a board which really
_does_ have an IOMMU? And we should probably get it into pci_ids.h too.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
index 4353cf5..f51f61b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
@@ -95,6 +95,20 @@ static void __init nvidia_bugs(int num, int slot, int func)
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMAR
+static void __init intel_g33_dmar(int num, int slot, int func)
+{
+ struct acpi_table_header *dmar_tbl;
+ acpi_status = status;
+
+ status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_DMAR, 0, &dmar_tbl);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "BIOS BUG: DMAR advertised on Intel G31/G33 chipset -- ignoring\n");
+ dmar_disabled = 1;
+ }
+}
+#endif
+
#define QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE 0x1
#define QFLAG_APPLIED 0x2
#define QFLAG_DONE (QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE|QFLAG_APPLIED)
@@ -114,6 +128,10 @@ static struct chipset early_qrk[] __initdata = {
PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, PCI_ANY_ID, QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE, via_bugs },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_K8_NB,
PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, fix_hypertransport_config },
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMAR
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x29c0,
+ PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, intel_g33_dmar },
+#endif
{}
};
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-02 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-01 20:14 David Woodhouse
2008-09-01 22:32 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-01 22:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-01 23:01 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-01 23:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-02 6:19 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-02 8:23 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2008-09-03 10:53 ` Blacklist DMAR on Intel G31/G33 chipsets David Woodhouse
2008-09-03 12:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-03 12:22 ` David Woodhouse
2008-09-04 8:54 ` [PATCH] " David Woodhouse
2008-09-05 18:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 18:47 ` David Woodhouse
2008-09-06 15:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-07 8:20 ` David Woodhouse
2008-09-07 15:35 ` [2.6.27 PATCH] " David Woodhouse
2008-09-09 18:39 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1220343790.2982.165.camel@pmac.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®