mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Misc fixes for 2.6.27
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:23:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220343790.2982.165.camel@pmac.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080902061920.GK18288@one.firstfloor.org>

On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 08:19 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 04:16:39PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:01:19 +0200
> > Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> writes:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:32:16 +0200
> > > > Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> writes:
> > > >> > +
> > > >> > +static struct dmi_system_id __initdata intel_iommu_dmi_table[]
> > > >> > = {
> > > >> > +	{	/* Some DG33BU BIOS revisions advertised
> > > >> > non-existent VT-d */
> > > >> 
> > > >> Are you sure it's non existent? A G33 chipset should have it in
> > > >> hardware I thought.
> > > >
> > > > nope they don't/
> > > > later ones and some other models do though, but not the G33
> > > 
> > > I see. But presumably that chipset will be in other motherboards
> > > too and that BIOS bug might be also wider spread. So it would be
> > > still better to key off an PCI-ID or similar.

It's certainly possible that the same BIOS bug could show up elsewhere.
I was expecting that we could add new motherboards to the DMI table if
that happens.

> > it would be nice, no doubt, unfortunately this code runs (and needs to
> > run) before the PCI subsystem is initialized...
> 
> early quirks handles these cases. Check out early-quirks.c

That might work, I suppose -- although the iommu probe happens early, it
looks like the early-quirks are handled even earlier. Unfortunately the
last attempt at flashing a BIOS on my DG33BU has turned it into a brick
and even the recovery procedure doesn't work, so I can't test any more
-- I'm more inclined to stick with what I'd tested, but if you feel
strongly and someone can test this version, then perhaps we could go
with that instead...

I made it check for this:
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31/P35/P31 Express DRAM Controller [8086:29c0] (rev 02)

Are we sure that device never going to appear on a board which really
_does_ have an IOMMU? And we should probably get it into pci_ids.h too.


diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
index 4353cf5..f51f61b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
@@ -95,6 +95,20 @@ static void __init nvidia_bugs(int num, int slot, int func)
 
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMAR
+static void __init intel_g33_dmar(int num, int slot, int func)
+{
+	struct acpi_table_header *dmar_tbl;
+	acpi_status = status;
+
+	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_DMAR, 0, &dmar_tbl);
+	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+		printk(KERN_INFO "BIOS BUG: DMAR advertised on Intel G31/G33 chipset -- ignoring\n");
+		dmar_disabled = 1;
+	}
+}
+#endif
+
 #define QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE 	0x1
 #define QFLAG_APPLIED		0x2
 #define QFLAG_DONE		(QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE|QFLAG_APPLIED)
@@ -114,6 +128,10 @@ static struct chipset early_qrk[] __initdata = {
 	  PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI, PCI_ANY_ID, QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE, via_bugs },
 	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_K8_NB,
 	  PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, fix_hypertransport_config },
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMAR
+	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x29c0,
+	  PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, intel_g33_dmar },
+#endif
 	{}
 };
 


-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com                              Intel Corporation




  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-02  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-01 20:14 David Woodhouse
2008-09-01 22:32 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-01 22:35   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-01 23:01     ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-01 23:16       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-02  6:19         ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-02  8:23           ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2008-09-03 10:53           ` Blacklist DMAR on Intel G31/G33 chipsets David Woodhouse
2008-09-03 12:09             ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-03 12:22               ` David Woodhouse
2008-09-04  8:54             ` [PATCH] " David Woodhouse
2008-09-05 18:34               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-05 18:47                 ` David Woodhouse
2008-09-06 15:49                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-07  8:20                     ` David Woodhouse
2008-09-07 15:35                 ` [2.6.27 PATCH] " David Woodhouse
2008-09-09 18:39                   ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1220343790.2982.165.camel@pmac.infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®