From: Ferry Toth <ftoth@telfort.nl>
To: Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DOS by unprivileged user
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 12:00:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12218300.6oQjICIiUq@ferry-quad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180425155459.5a4e40e0@alans-desktop>
Op woensdag 25 april 2018 16:54:59 CEST schreef Alan Cox:
> > > I think memory allocation and io waits can't be decoupled from
> > > scheduling as they are now.
> >
> > The scheduler is not decoupled from either, it is intimately involved
> > in both. However, none of the decision making smarts for either reside
> > in the scheduler, nor should they.
>
> It belongs in both.
>
> Classical Unix systems never had this problem because they respond to
> thrashing by ensuring that all processes consumed CPU and made some
> progress. Linux handles it by thrashing itself to dealth while BSD always
> handled it by moving from paging more towards swapping and behaving like
> a swap bound batch machine.
>
> Linux thrashes itself to death, the classic BSD algorithn instead throws
> fairness out of the window under extreme load to prevent it. It might take
> a few seconds but at least you will get your prompt back.
>
> Alan
>
I haven\0t tried BSD.
But when I was young I allocated 10MB on a HP9000 (UX) with 1MB of RAM. People wanted to launch me out of the window (18th floor).
I did not want to say Unix was better, only with so much emphasis on security I'\0m surprised how easy it is for a regular user to bring linux to on it\0s knees.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-30 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-19 19:13 Ferry Toth
2018-04-20 4:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-04-20 8:39 ` Ferry Toth
2018-04-20 12:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-04-22 10:16 ` Pavel Machek
2018-04-22 17:43 ` vcaputo
2018-04-23 0:27 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-23 7:13 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <4285098.DEWjdbWF2X@delfion>
[not found] ` <1524325275.8078.2.camel@gmx.de>
[not found] ` <6057755.ozdVOybsI6@delfion>
2018-04-23 8:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-04-25 14:54 ` Alan Cox
2018-04-25 16:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-04-25 16:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-04-30 10:00 ` Ferry Toth [this message]
2018-04-30 10:35 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12218300.6oQjICIiUq@ferry-quad \
--to=ftoth@telfort.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®