From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753293AbYIZSRv (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:17:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752576AbYIZSRn (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:17:43 -0400 Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]:23200 "EHLO mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752503AbYIZSRm (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:17:42 -0400 From: Ian Campbell To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: Tom Tucker , Trond Myklebust , Grant Coady , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1222443426.3949.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080912224323.GN22126@fieldses.org> <48CAF80A.4010109@opengridcomputing.com> <1221296243.2534.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1221544139.2534.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <48CF9AC3.6060801@opengridcomputing.com> <1221577412.28572.60.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <48CFD7C3.5080207@opengridcomputing.com> <1221582285.28572.67.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1222156770.6869.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1222169589.6869.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080923170344.GC2700@fieldses.org> <1222443426.3949.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-GrfiCwdn8hFeHg9fofwS" Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:17:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1222453053.3949.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.5 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ijc@hellion.org.uk Subject: Re: NFS regression? Odd delays and lockups accessing an NFS export. X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on hopkins.hellion.org.uk) X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=unbeb6qN2T0A:10 a=497XeZ5pv4kA:10 a=ijTiBfrIHQB_UN5j2U4A:9 a=1uHPAgRz4uFjEvlFzgTpGod8E98A:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 a=N0lm2LWaPJl4qaE2jGIA:9 a=CHqpT_MWcvuJjhj301CLl19e0zQA:4 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-GrfiCwdn8hFeHg9fofwS Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 16:37 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > It's possible, the good case is naturally quite hard to establish with > 100% certainty. I declared v2.6.26 OK after an uptime of 4 days and 19 > hours, compared with failure normally within 1-2 days. It's possible I > was premature in doing so. I'll run 2e96d2867 for at least a full week > before reporting back. Or it'll reproduce after just a few hours :-/ Looks like a false negative on v2.6.26 -- I'll retest from there. Ian. --=20 Ian Campbell That secret you've been guarding, isn't. --=-GrfiCwdn8hFeHg9fofwS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkjdJzwACgkQM0+0qS9rzVlhXgCfVfi+FgdOHW3/5wkWUmhU4dqS Z9QAniJhdkWjeeg1WjgEWTK2hN7Yot/J =xvRm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-GrfiCwdn8hFeHg9fofwS--