From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752600AbYI3LLz (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:11:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753397AbYI3LLl (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:11:41 -0400 Received: from m-relay2.rz.uni-saarland.de ([134.96.7.8]:24021 "EHLO eris.rz.uni-saarland.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752956AbYI3LLk (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:11:40 -0400 From: Alexander van Heukelum To: Ingo Molnar , LKML Cc: Alexander van Heukelum Subject: [PATCH 0/2] x86: split out dumpstack code from traps_xx.c Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:12:13 +0200 Message-Id: <1222773135-1073-1-git-send-email-heukelum@fastmail.fm> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.5.4.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (eris.rz.uni-saarland.de [134.96.7.8]); Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:11:20 +0200 (CEST) X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.1.2-14; AVE: 7.8.1.34; VDF: 7.0.6.227; host: AntiVir2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ingo, I intend to keep looking for possibilities to bring traps_32.c and traps_64.c closer to each-other. One trivial way (from my point of view) is to split out code into separate files. These two patches split out a large piece of code that has nothing to do with hardware traps. Are you willing to take those two patches? Or are they to intrusive? Patches are against the current master branch of the tip tree. The defconfigs compile fine and I ran some simple configs within qemu. Greetings, Alexander