From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754001AbYJHKaA (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:30:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753287AbYJHK3v (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:29:51 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:55820 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755455AbYJHK3u (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:29:50 -0400 Subject: Re: linux-firmware patches From: David Woodhouse To: Dave Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <48EBAC11.7060803@gmail.com> References: <48EBAC11.7060803@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 11:29:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1223461786.20499.29.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 19:36 +0100, Dave wrote: > Should patches to add firmware to the linux-firmware tree (and not the > main kernel) be sent to linux-kernel, or somewhere else? It wasn't > mentioned in the [ANNOUNCE]*, and I haven't been able to find an > example on list. > > Just wanted to check before posting an 80k patch consisting of non-GPL > binary files. Patches with binary files are going to be hard -- probably best just to commit to a git tree and ask me to pull. Or mail the files separately, with the changes to the WHENCE file as a separate patch. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation