From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756555AbYK3VCv (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:02:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756433AbYK3VCl (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:02:41 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:44787 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756435AbYK3VCk (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:02:40 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type :organization:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=cafkcOW4Th6GOKQZY8HhQFeK8XnihJUEQ7eUh1GMrHOGzAt0qDgcFE/VIvvjFxxfbx nGtc6tsEysHrfht66PApqM44QORD88Cn2/4ArJWV7xdLA1PiD3/nVqUohLLZSKgZxFXC 6hobxFxpZxl9ohHKLKWvSzTsewdUSKL1mbXg0= Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] Add /proc/mempool to display mempool usage From: Remi Colinet Reply-To: remi.colinet@gmail.com To: Greg KH Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , Kernel In-Reply-To: <20081129234907.GA2340@kroah.com> References: <1227980689.6354.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20081129214207.GA6747@x200.localdomain> <20081129234907.GA2340@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Personal Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:00:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1228078811.2658.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 15:49 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:42:07AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 06:44:49PM +0100, Remi Colinet wrote: > > > This patch add a new /proc/mempool file in order to display mempool usage. > > > > > > The feature can be disabled with CONFIG_PROC_MEMPOOL=N during kernel > > > configuration. > > > > We're NOT adding config option per proc file. > > > > And can we, please, freeze /proc for not per-process stuff and open debugfs > > for random stuff, please? > > debugfs has been open for random stuff since the day it was added to the > tree :) > > Feel free to put this kind of thing there instead of proc. > Acknowledged, > thanks, > > greg k-h Thanks, Remi