From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: MAP_PRIVATE that stays private even on external write
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:27:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228213651.7133.12.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493508b5$0$200$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 10:06 +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> I have an application that mmaps blocks from a file and then
> sends it out over a TCP socket.
>
> The contents of the file may be overwritten while the blocks
> are sent out, but there is a very low chance of that.
>
> To prevent this, I can ofcourse just use read() all blocks into
> memory in advance, check consistency, and go ahead .. but since
> there may be a lot of network connections active this might cost
> a lot of memory.
>
> What I am looking for is a MAP_PRIVATE type flag that, when another
> process modifies pages of the file (through mmap() or write())
> makes sure that my mapping never sees that.
>
> I found out that mmap(MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_POPULATE) does exactly what
> I want, but ofcourse it reads in the entire mapping all at once,
> which is equivalent to plain read().
>
> There has been talk of a MAP_SNAPSHOT flag before, e.g.
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0407.1/0416.htm
>
> Has anyone ever looked at implementing something like this ?
I suppose that needs a snapshot filesystem for backing, and we don't
have such a creature (yet). I suppose BTRFS might be able to pull that
off.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-02 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-02 10:06 Miquel van Smoorenburg
2008-12-02 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-12-02 14:34 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2008-12-02 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228213651.7133.12.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®