From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757433AbZAGBu4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:50:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753019AbZAGBuq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:50:46 -0500 Received: from mx2.netapp.com ([216.240.18.37]:9668 "EHLO mx2.netapp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752652AbZAGBup (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:50:45 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,222,1231142400"; d="scan'208";a="109005602" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: Use utsnamespaces From: Trond Myklebust To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Matt Helsley , Linux Containers , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chuck Lever , Linux Containers , Cedric Le Goater In-Reply-To: <20090107014422.GA17913@fieldses.org> References: <20090106200229.GA17031@us.ibm.com> <1231274682.20316.65.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090106215831.GE18147@us.ibm.com> <1231283734.8041.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090106233238.GD13785@fieldses.org> <1231284943.8041.8.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <1231287607.11487.0.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090107002608.GK13785@fieldses.org> <1231288706.11487.15.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20090107014422.GA17913@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: NetApp Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:50:25 -0500 Message-Id: <1231293025.11487.43.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2009 01:50:44.0631 (UTC) FILETIME=[5AA3FA70:01C9706A] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:44 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Again, why? Are you seriously proposing a plan to transport all NFS and > > locking state directly from one kernel to another? > > If people seem to think they can do live process and container > migration: > > http://ols.fedoraproject.org/OLS/Reprints-2008/mirkin-reprint.pdf > > then moving the NFS state strikes me as not the greatest of their > troubles. ROTFL... -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer NetApp Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com www.netapp.com