mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@google.com>
Cc: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@gmail.com>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:31:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233664304.1568.39.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090202215740.GA26550@google.com>

On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 13:57 -0800, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
> The hung_task timeout is now 480 seconds because of sys_sync:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=fb822db465bd9fd4208eef1af4490539b236c54e
> 
> But are there are really any other tasks which call
> schedule_timeout_uninterruptibl() for with a timeout >480 seconds?
> 
> Right now kmemleak appears to be the only exception. (A quick grep didn't turn
> anything up.) And it is trivial to change kmemleak to use INTERRUPTIBLE.
> Might even be a nice feature. You could stop it faster that way.

I changed the code as below as it makes more sense:

--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -1044,6 +1044,7 @@ static int kmemleak_scan_thread(void *arg)
 
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		struct kmemleak_object *object;
+		signed long timeout = jiffies_scan_wait;
 
 		mutex_lock(&scan_mutex);
 
@@ -1069,7 +1070,8 @@ static int kmemleak_scan_thread(void *arg)
 
 		mutex_unlock(&scan_mutex);
 		/* wait before the next scan */
-		schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(jiffies_scan_wait);
+		while (timeout && !kthread_should_stop())
+			timeout = schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout);
 	}
 
 	pr_info("kmemleak: Automatic memory scanning thread ended\n");

-- 
Catalin


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-03 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-02 11:27 Alexander Beregalov
2009-02-02 14:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-02-02 15:14   ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-02-02 15:15   ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-02-02 21:57     ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2009-02-03  0:41       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-03 12:48         ` Catalin Marinas
2009-02-03 20:52           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-06 16:02             ` next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120seconds Catalin Marinas
2009-02-03 12:31       ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2009-02-03 11:57   ` next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds Alexander Beregalov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1233664304.1568.39.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=a.beregalov@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=msb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®