mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 35 of 36] x86: make pgd/pud/pmd/pte_none consistent
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:45:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233935101.20597.28.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233934150.20597.26.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:29 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 11:31 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > The _none test is done differently for every level of the pagetable.
> > Standardize them by:
> > 
> >  1: Use the native_X_val to extract the raw entry, with no need to go
> >     via paravirt_ops, diff -r 1d0646d0d319 arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h, and
> >  2: Compare with 0 rather than using a boolean !, since they are actually values
> >     and not booleans.
> 
> In a 32 bit Xen guest this one causes
> 
>         [    8.354898] 1 multicall(s) failed: cpu 1

Spoke too soon, it's not as 100% reliably reproducing as I thought which
confused my bisection attempt. Will try and locate the real culprit...

Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell

For a man to truly understand rejection, he must first be ignored by a cat.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-06 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-05 19:30 [PATCH 00 of 36] x86: clean up pte functions in pgtable*.h Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 01 of 36] x86: unify pte_none Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 02 of 36] x86: unify pte_same Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 03 of 36] x86: unify pte_present Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 04 of 36] x86: make _PAGE_HIDDEN conditional Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 05 of 36] x86: unify pte_hidden Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 06 of 36] x86: unify pud_present Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 07 of 36] x86: unify pgd_present Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 08 of 36] x86: unify pmd_present Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 09 of 36] x86: unify pmd_none Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 10 of 36] x86: unify pgd_page_vaddr Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 11 of 36] x86: unify pud_page_vaddr Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 12 of 36] x86: include pgtable_SIZE.h earlier Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 13 of 36] x86: unify pud_page Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 14 of 36] x86: unify pgd_page Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 15 of 36] x86: unify pud_index Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 16 of 36] x86: unify pud_offset Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:30 ` [PATCH 17 of 36] x86: unify pmd_page_vaddr Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 18 of 36] x86: unify pmd_page Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 19 of 36] x86: unify pmd_index Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 20 of 36] x86: unify pmd_offset Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 21 of 36] x86: remove redundant pfn_pmd definition Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 22 of 36] x86: unify pmd_pfn Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 23 " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 24 of 36] x86: unify pte_index Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 25 of 36] x86: unify pte_offset_kernel Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 26 of 36] x86: unify pud_large Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 27 of 36] x86: unify pgd_bad Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 28 " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 29 of 36] x86: unify pmd_bad Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 30 of 36] x86: unify pages_to_mb Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 31 of 36] x86: unify pud_none Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 32 of 36] x86: unify pgd_none Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 33 of 36] x86: unify io_remap_pfn_range Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 34 of 36] x86: add and use pgd/pud/pmd_flags Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 35 of 36] x86: make pgd/pud/pmd/pte_none consistent Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-06 15:29   ` Ian Campbell
2009-02-06 15:45     ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2009-02-06 17:43       ` Ian Campbell
2009-02-05 19:31 ` [PATCH 36 of 36] x86: make the X_bad functions consistent Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-05 20:25   ` Hugh Dickins
2009-02-05 20:39     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1233935101.20597.28.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
    --to=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®