From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754439AbZBJKx1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:53:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752728AbZBJKxT (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:53:19 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:18186 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751726AbZBJKxS (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:53:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Bo7/Z8oVDPSkN1isN3dQam6pNcocg6f1pLjuTlcFhvrtPEq5UQ1XJIGv2qZKNjHveI 8LkKytwmEt28QF8Qg92440pDNW51VF3FYa4vZuAbCjKyHcp3W1t1ZFXnygaoaBs9M9yn o5aTDenuU+U5O9yUT6114M7sR6MjZSM5dwdhE= Subject: Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4 From: Alessandro Bono To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <20090210104304.GP8830@disturbed> References: <1234011974.7435.11.camel@champagne.cantina> <20090208222859.GA2532@infradead.org> <1234132752.12370.0.camel@champagne.cantina> <20090208224249.GA11931@infradead.org> <1234133120.12370.7.camel@champagne.cantina> <20090209075308.GA7360@infradead.org> <20090210104304.GP8830@disturbed> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:53:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1234263194.7462.8.camel@champagne.cantina> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 21:43 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:53:08AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:45:20PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote: > > > sure, attached > > > > That would be a missing PagePrivate bit in page_buffers() called from > > end_buffer_async_write. PG_private can only be cleared via drop_buffers > > which requires the page not having PG_writeback set which must be > > set until end_buffer_async_write is done. Very strange, and all this > > is generic code without xfs involvement. Did this happen once > > or can you reproduce it? > > Hmmmm - i wonder if this has anything to do with the writeback fixes > that went into 2.6.28.2? Alessandro, can you revert to 2.6.28.1 (not > plain 2.6.28) and see if you can reproduce the problem? no problem I'll try with 2.6.28.1 a full rsync (circa 210G) maybe I can do this today > > Cheers, > > Dave. -- --- Cordiali Saluti Alessandro Bono