From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1752560AbZBRLgK@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752560AbZBRLgK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:36:10 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751095AbZBRLf4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:35:56 -0500
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:52399 "HELO mail.gmx.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1751028AbZBRLf4 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:35:56 -0500
X-Authenticated: #14349625
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18kUX5qDAokLa0L/gwq5ZavKsxMmgvoLagJBW+NAo
	j0sliLmHk9myPy
Subject: Re: CFQ is worse than other IO schedulers in some cases
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Shan Wei <shanwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <499BDFD1.4090706@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <499BA413.2010705@cn.fujitsu.com>
	 <1234944336.6141.8.camel@marge.simson.net>
	 <499BDFD1.4090706@cn.fujitsu.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:35:51 +0100
Message-Id: <1234956951.5610.6.camel@marge.simson.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.72
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 18:15 +0800, Shan Wei wrote:

> Can you confirm the dump command on your box?

I don't have dump installed.  BTW, kernel was 2.6.28.5.

	-Mike