From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Maly <bmaly@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix e820 end address with EFI
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:25:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235960708.6204.176.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49AB4171.7000508@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2223 bytes --]
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 10:16 +0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Huang Ying wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 09:39 +0800, Brian Maly wrote:
> >> Huang Ying wrote:
> >>> Hi, Brian,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 04:13 +0800, Brian Maly wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I was able verify the kernel that does not boot on the MacBook (vanilla
> >>>> 2.6.29-rc4) does call efi_ioremap() which bails out early returning
> >>>> NULL. So no remapping happens in this case. I have no idea if
> >>>> efi_ioremap ever does succeed in mapping any ranges though being I have
> >>>> no video or console this early in the boot and have to rely on triple
> >>>> faulting as a means of debugging.
> >>>>
> >>> Please attach your dmesg of successful boot, so we can take a look at
> >>> the EFI memory map.
> >>>
> >>> Best Regards,
> >>> Huang Ying
> >>>
> >> This dmesg is from a 2.6.25 kernel which works fine. I can gather
> >> other debugging info from the booting kernels if needed. But its a
> >> challenge to debug the bad kernel being efifb is initialized very late
> >> (so you never even get to the video initialization and cant see any
> >> logged messages) and since its a MacBook I dont have a real serial
> >> port for serial console. The efi map is for MacBook has a different
> >> layout from other EFI systems I have to test on. 2.6.29 kernel works
> >> on every EFI system I have except MacBook.
> >
> > It seems that you have an EFI system which has too big runtime area.
> >
> > EFI: mem44: type=0, attr=0x8000000000000000, range=[0x000000007ff00000-0x0000000080000000) (1MB)
> >
> > efi_ioremap() can map only memory range < 400k now.
> >
> > It seems that efi_ioremap is the bottle net now. Can we just use
> > init_memory_mapping() instead of efi_ioremap() for EFI runtime area?
> >
> > Yinghai, how about your opinion?
>
> you could call init_memory_maping() in that efi_ioremap position?
>
> problems is how about 32bit?
efi_ioremap() is defined as ioremap_cache() on 32bit system. As that in
arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h.
On 64bit system, efi_ioremap() can be a wrapper for
init_memory_mapping(). Do you think it is appropriate?
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-02 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-28 16:26 Brian Maly
2009-03-01 4:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 5:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 18:44 ` Brian Maly
2009-03-01 20:13 ` Brian Maly
2009-03-01 20:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-02 1:07 ` Huang Ying
2009-03-02 1:41 ` Brian Maly
2009-03-02 1:45 ` Brian Maly
[not found] ` <49AB38E7.60305@redhat.com>
2009-03-02 2:13 ` Huang Ying
2009-03-02 2:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-02 2:25 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2009-03-02 2:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-02 2:37 ` Huang Ying
2009-03-02 2:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-02 7:45 ` Huang Ying
2009-03-02 21:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-03 1:07 ` Huang Ying
2009-03-03 1:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-03 2:22 ` Huang Ying
2009-03-03 2:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-03 3:06 ` Huang Ying
2009-03-03 3:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-03 5:32 ` Huang Ying
2009-03-03 5:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-03 5:40 ` Huang Ying
2009-03-03 5:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-03 6:37 ` Huang Ying
2009-03-03 7:36 ` [PATCH] x86: make init_memory_mapping could handle small range Yinghai Lu
2009-03-03 7:51 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: fix init_memory_mapping() to handle small ranges Yinghai Lu
2009-03-02 2:57 ` [PATCH] Fix e820 end address with EFI Brian Maly
2009-03-02 3:06 ` Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1235960708.6204.176.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=bmaly@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome