mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	efault@gmx.de, andi@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sched: Extend sched_mc/smt_power_savings framework
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:28:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236094110.5330.4733.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090303152504.GH4708@dirshya.in.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:55 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
>  
> > It would be good to mention something about how power usage is measured.
> 
> Power usage is measured by computing the energy consumed over the
> benchmark duration and then finding average power by dividing
> energy/time.  The relative power consumption is for the entire system.

Is this measured using an external (indepedent) power monitor, or
looking at system internal power usage stats?

Have you compared these two methods, if so, do they give comparable
results?

> > Furthermore, do we really need those separate mc/smt power savings
> > settings? -- It appears to me we ought to consolidate some of that and
> > provide a single knob to save power.
> 
> Yes, having one sched_power_savings will definitely help.  However,
> mapping the various combination of settings to a single knob that will
> provide consistent behavior across workloads and system configuration
> is a challenge.

Would it be an option to provide a single knob for users and have some
fine grained feature set for developing/debugging, much like we have
sched_features?


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-03 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-03 11:51 Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-03 11:51 ` [PATCH 2 1/3] sched: code cleanup - sd_power_saving_flags(), sd_balance_for_mc/package_power() Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-03 11:51 ` [PATCH 2 2/3] sched: Fix the wakeup nomination for sched_mc/smt_power_savings Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-03 12:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-03 13:59     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-03 15:45       ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-03-03 15:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-03 16:26           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-03 11:51 ` [PATCH 2 3/3] sched: Fix sd_parent_degenerate for SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE Gautham R Shenoy
2009-03-03 12:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sched: Extend sched_mc/smt_power_savings framework Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-03 15:25   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-03-03 15:28     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-03-04 11:06       ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-03-04 11:38         ` Gautham R Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1236094110.5330.4733.camel@laptop \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®