From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Brian Maly <bmaly@redhat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix DMI for EFI
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:33:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236216818.24215.24.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090304175418.GB29823@elte.hu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1090 bytes --]
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 01:54 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Brian Maly <bmaly@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> Hm, could we ever find ourselves in the positition of having to access
> >> the DMI strings table in the EFI init code, to implement a quirk? I
> >> think that's quite plausible.
> >
> >> OTOH, with some DMI quirks in EFI tables it's a bit of a chicken and
> >> egg problem. Can DMI strings ever be outside of EFI tables on EFI
> >> systems?
> >
> >> Ingo
> >
> > Right now it is EFI that loads the dmi tables (and all other
> > tables such as ACPI), so it is a chicken and the egg. I think
> > that if dmi is ever needed by EFI, the dmi scan will have to
> > be moved inside efi_init. We could move the dmi scan into
> > efi_init and do the dmi scan the moment we have the dmi table.
> > Thats really the soonest point we could scan on EFI systems.
> > Im OK with moving dmi to efi_init if you prefer.
>
> Your patch looks fine, but i'd like to hear the opinion of Ying
> Huang as well.
This patch is OK for me.
Thanks,
Huang Ying
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-05 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-01 2:40 Brian Maly
2009-03-01 2:56 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 3:11 ` Brian Maly
2009-03-01 3:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-01 3:58 ` Brian Maly
2009-03-04 2:55 ` Brian Maly
2009-03-04 11:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04 15:03 ` Brian Maly
2009-03-04 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04 18:00 ` Brian Maly
2009-03-04 18:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-05 1:33 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2009-03-05 10:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04 17:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: fix DMI on EFI Brian Maly
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-01 1:33 [PATCH] fix DMI for EFI Brian Maly
2009-03-01 2:01 ` Kyle McMartin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1236216818.24215.24.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=bmaly@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®