From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: include inverse Xmas tree patches
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:18:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238258883.2526.24.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090328150745.GC31080@8bytes.org>
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 16:07 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:18:50PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > The following changes since commit 29219683c46cb89edf5c58418b5305b14646d030:
> > Ingo Molnar (1):
> > Merge branches 'x86/apic', 'x86/cleanups', 'x86/mm', 'x86/pat', 'x86/setup' and 'x86/signal'; commit 'v2.6.29' into x86/core
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-Xmas.git x86/core
> >
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (49):
> > x86: process_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: signal.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: entry_32.S include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: traps.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: irq.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: irq_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: dumpstack.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: time_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: ioport.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: ldt.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: dumpstack_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: setup.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: i8259.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: irqinit_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: probe_roms_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: sys_i386_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: i386_ksyms_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: bootflag.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: e820.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: pci-dma.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: quirks.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: i8237.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: alternative.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: tsc.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: process.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: xsave.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: ptrace.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: ds.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: tls.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: step.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: stacktrace.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: reboot.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: msr.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: cpuid.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: early-quirks.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: smp.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: smpboot.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: tsc_sync.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: setup_percpu.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: trampoline_32.S include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: mpparse.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: module_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: doublefault_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: vm86_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > ix86: early_printk.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: pcspeaker.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: head_32.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: head.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
> > x86: init_task.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
>
> Where have you sent these patches for review?
>
-tip's master.
> > Complete diff:
>
> No. Complete diffs are not easy to review. At least not in this size.
46 of 49 are clean patches, and only 3 are doubtful which you pointed. I
am attaching those patches for feedback.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
> > index 49fb3ec..a8d63be 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/proto.h
> > @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
> >
> > extern void early_idt_handler(void);
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > extern void system_call(void);
> > +#endif
> > extern void syscall_init(void);
> >
> > extern void ia32_syscall(void);
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h
> > index ad1478c..f80df2e 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > #ifndef _ASM_X86_SIGCONTEXT32_H
> > #define _ASM_X86_SIGCONTEXT32_H
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> >
> > /* signal context for 32bit programs. */
> > @@ -73,5 +74,5 @@ struct sigcontext_ia32 {
> > unsigned int oldmask;
> > unsigned int cr2;
> > };
> > -
> > +#endif
> > #endif /* _ASM_X86_SIGCONTEXT32_H */
>
> This doesn't seem to be related to your header include rearangements.
>
Please check this patch then you will find the relation:
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:02:42 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: xsave.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
Impact: Xmas tree effect
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h
index ad1478c..f80df2e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sigcontext32.h
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_SIGCONTEXT32_H
#define _ASM_X86_SIGCONTEXT32_H
+#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
#include <linux/types.h>
/* signal context for 32bit programs. */
@@ -73,5 +74,5 @@ struct sigcontext_ia32 {
unsigned int oldmask;
unsigned int cr2;
};
-
+#endif
#endif /* _ASM_X86_SIGCONTEXT32_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c b/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
index 2b54fe0..778ed67 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
@@ -3,12 +3,11 @@
*
* Author: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
*/
+
+#include <asm/sigcontext32.h>
#include <linux/bootmem.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <asm/i387.h>
-#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
-#include <asm/sigcontext32.h>
-#endif
#include <asm/xcr.h>
/*
--
1.6.0.6
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h
> > index 1def601..dff6e11 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h
> > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> > /* two abstractions specific to kernel/smpboot.c, mainly to cater to visws
> > * which needs to alter them. */
> >
> > +#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> > +
> > static inline void smpboot_clear_io_apic_irqs(void)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:46:42 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: smpboot.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
Impact: Xmas tree effect
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h
index 1def601..dff6e11 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smpboot_hooks.h
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
/* two abstractions specific to kernel/smpboot.c, mainly to cater to visws
* which needs to alter them. */
+#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+
static inline void smpboot_clear_io_apic_irqs(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index ef7d101..60f6dde 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -39,33 +39,32 @@
* Glauber Costa : i386 and x86_64 integration
*/
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/mc146818rtc.h>
+#include <linux/bootmem.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
-#include <linux/bootmem.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/nmi.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <asm/smpboot_hooks.h>
+#include <asm/trampoline.h>
+#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+#include <asm/pgtable.h>
+#include <asm/setup.h>
+#include <asm/uv/uv.h>
#include <asm/acpi.h>
+#include <asm/apic.h>
#include <asm/desc.h>
-#include <asm/nmi.h>
-#include <asm/irq.h>
#include <asm/idle.h>
-#include <asm/trampoline.h>
-#include <asm/cpu.h>
-#include <asm/numa.h>
-#include <asm/pgtable.h>
-#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
#include <asm/mtrr.h>
+#include <asm/numa.h>
+#include <asm/cpu.h>
+#include <asm/irq.h>
+#include <asm/nmi.h>
#include <asm/vmi.h>
-#include <asm/apic.h>
-#include <asm/setup.h>
-#include <asm/uv/uv.h>
-#include <linux/mc146818rtc.h>
-
-#include <asm/smpboot_hooks.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
u8 apicid_2_node[MAX_APICID];
--
1.6.0.6
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> > index 77cfb2c..1f23e58 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> > @@ -194,10 +194,12 @@ extern int __node_distance(int, int);
> >
> > #else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
> >
> > +#if 0
> > static inline int numa_node_id(void)
> > {
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +#endif
>
> "#if 0" ???
>
Hmm, this is really funny and doubtful. numa_node_id is already defined.
Rusty :-)
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:11:43 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: setup_percpu.c include inverse Xmas tree effect
Impact: Xmas tree effect
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
index 77cfb2c..1f23e58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
@@ -194,10 +194,12 @@ extern int __node_distance(int, int);
#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
+#if 0
static inline int numa_node_id(void)
{
return 0;
}
+#endif
static inline int cpu_to_node(int cpu)
{
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
index 400331b..85e84b4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
@@ -1,23 +1,24 @@
+#include <linux/crash_dump.h>
+#include <linux/topology.h>
+#include <linux/bootmem.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/bootmem.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/kexec.h>
-#include <linux/crash_dump.h>
-#include <linux/smp.h>
-#include <linux/topology.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/pfn.h>
-#include <asm/sections.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+
+#include <asm/stackprotector.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/setup.h>
-#include <asm/mpspec.h>
+#include <asm/sections.h>
#include <asm/apicdef.h>
+#include <asm/cpumask.h>
#include <asm/highmem.h>
+#include <asm/mpspec.h>
#include <asm/proto.h>
-#include <asm/cpumask.h>
+#include <asm/setup.h>
#include <asm/cpu.h>
-#include <asm/stackprotector.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS
# define DBG(x...) printk(KERN_DEBUG x)
--
1.6.0.6
--
JSR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-28 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-28 14:48 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-28 15:07 ` Joerg Roedel
2009-03-28 16:48 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-03-28 17:16 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-28 15:07 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-28 15:55 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-28 15:58 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-28 16:11 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-28 16:28 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-28 19:03 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-03-28 22:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-28 22:37 ` Al Viro
2009-03-28 23:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-28 23:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-28 23:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-29 0:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-29 0:24 ` Al Viro
2009-03-29 10:25 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-29 0:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-29 1:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-29 7:57 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-28 15:17 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-03-28 23:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-29 6:38 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-29 11:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-29 14:38 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-28 23:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-29 5:54 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1238258883.2526.24.camel@ht.satnam \
--to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®