mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] perf_counter: provide generic callchain bits
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:39:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238481552.28248.1384.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18897.46177.528910.51044@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 17:12 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra writes:
> 
> >  				include_tid    :  1, /* include the tid       */
> >  				mmap           :  1, /* include mmap data     */
> >  				munmap         :  1, /* include munmap data   */
> > +				callchain      :  1, /* add callchain data    */
> 
> Interesting, I would have put callchain (and include_tid, also) in
> hw_event.record_type rather than as individual 1-bit fields.  The
> present arrangement where some selection of what goes into the ring
> buffer is in record_type and some is in individual bits seems a bit
> awkward.  Plus, with the current arrangement I can't get both the IP
> and the values of the other group members, which I might reasonable
> want.
> 
> I think either we make record_type bit-significant, or we define
> individual bits in hw_event for recording the IP and other group
> members.
> 
> There are a couple of other things I want to be able to record on an
> event - we have registers on powerpc that give information about the
> event that caused the interrupt, and it would be nice to be able to
> record them.  (These registers include instruction and data addresses
> associated with the event; the instruction address can be further on
> from where the interrupt was taken because of out-of-order instruction
> execution and because interrupts might be hard-disabled at the point
> where the interrupt becomes pending.)
> 
> Those registers would need bits in record_type or in the hw_event to
> indicate that we want them recorded.

Sure, I'm fine with moving them to record_type and making that a bit
field. I've also considered merging the group and 'simple' output to
enable what you say.




  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-31  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-30 17:07 [PATCH 00/15] pending perf_counter bits Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 01/15] perf_counter: unify and fix delayed counter wakeup Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-31  5:45   ` Paul Mackerras
2009-03-31  6:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01  9:04       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-01 10:12   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 02/15] perf_counter: fix update_userpage() Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:12   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 03/15] perf_counter: kerneltop: simplify data_head read Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:13   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 04/15] perf_counter: executable mmap() information Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:13   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 05/15] perf_counter: kerneltop: parse the mmap data stream Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:13   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 06/15] perf_counter: powerpc: only reserve PMU hardware when we need it Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:13   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Paul Mackerras
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 07/15] perf_counter: make it possible for hw_perf_counter_init to return error codes Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:13   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Paul Mackerras
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 08/15] perf_counter: x86: proper error propagation for the x86 hw_perf_counter_init() Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:13   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 09/15] perf_counter tools: optionally scale counter values in perfstat mode Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01  9:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-01 10:50     ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-01 10:14   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Paul Mackerras
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 10/15] perf_counter: small cleanup of the output routines Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:14   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 11/15] perf_counter: re-arrange the perf_event_type Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:14   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 12/15] pref_counter: kerneltop: update event_types Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:14   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter tools: " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 13/15] perf_counter: provide generic callchain bits Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-31  6:12   ` Paul Mackerras
2009-03-31  6:39     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-03-31  7:24       ` Corey Ashford
2009-03-31  8:43         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-31  9:09           ` Paul Mackerras
2009-03-31  9:12         ` Paul Mackerras
2009-03-31 14:00           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-31 17:11             ` Corey Ashford
2009-04-01  3:48             ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-01  7:59               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01  8:45                 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-01 10:00                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-01 11:53                     ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-01 23:25                 ` Corey Ashford
2009-04-02  6:43                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02  7:41                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02  9:10                       ` Paul Mackerras
2009-04-02  9:14                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:14   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 14/15] perf_counter: x86: callchain support Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:14   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 17:07 ` [PATCH 15/15] perf_counter: pmc arbitration Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-01 10:15   ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-31  5:43 ` [PATCH 00/15] pending perf_counter bits Paul Mackerras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1238481552.28248.1384.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome