From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [3/4] x86: MCE: Improve mce_get_rip
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:35:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240554911.6842.880.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F15922.5090704@jp.fujitsu.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2222 bytes --]
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 14:16 +0800, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Huang Ying wrote:
> > Add some description for the patch, hope that to be more clear.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Huang Ying
> > --------------------------------------------->
> > mce_get_rip() is used to get IP when MCE is generated, usually from
> > the stack. But the IP on the stack is not always valid.
> > MCG_STATUS_RIPV indicates program can restart from the IP on the stack,
> > so if it is set, the IP is valid. MCG_STATUS_EIPV indicate IP on the
> > stack is directly associated with the error, so if it is set, the IP
> > is valid too.
> >
> > In current implementation, no IP will be returned (and then reported)
> > if MCG_STATUS_RIPV is not set and MCG_STATUS_EIPV is set. This patch
> > fixes this issue by returning IP on the stack when MCG_STATUS_EIPV is
> > set.
> >
> > In some CPU, a MSR (rip_msr) provides another way to get IP when MCE
> > is generated. This is used by mce_get_rip() too.
> >
> > There is no MSR for CS, in current implementation, if rip_msr is used
> > to get IP, reported CS is set to 0. But in fact, the CS on the stack
> > can be trusted if MCG_STATUS_RIPV or MCG_STATUS_EIPV is set. This
> > patch fixes this issue by keeping reported CS when rip_msr is used.
>
> So the bug is in short:
> In some cases no IP/CS reported even there were valid records.
> Right?
>
> Then in other words it will mean lost of error information, that is not
> good for error investigation.
>
> One question is: if (RIPV,EIPV) = (0,0), then is the IP on the stack
> really invalid value, or is it still point IP when MCE is generated?
> I suppose it is not invalid. If a processor encounters MCE and if it
> is not sure what happened, then it will store the IP on the stack,
> indicating neither of flags.
>
> If this supposition is correct, the best way is pick the value on
> the stack unconditionally, and record valid flags together.
According to spec, the IP on stack can be not related to MCE if
(RIPV,EIPV) = (0,0). So it is meaningless to report them. If you report
them unconditionally, you just push the logic to user space or
administrator.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-24 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-07 15:06 [PATCH] [0/4] x86: MCE: Machine check bug fix series for 2.6.30 Andi Kleen
2009-04-07 15:06 ` [PATCH] [1/4] x86: MCE: Make polling timer interval per CPU Andi Kleen
2009-04-08 3:43 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-08 10:43 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-08 11:30 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-08 11:40 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-09 10:28 ` [PATCH] [1/4] x86: MCE: Make polling timer interval per CPU v2 Andi Kleen
2009-04-07 15:06 ` [PATCH] [2/4] x86: MCE: Fix boot logging logic Andi Kleen
2009-04-07 15:06 ` [PATCH] [3/4] x86: MCE: Improve mce_get_rip Andi Kleen
2009-04-08 8:15 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-08 10:06 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-09 4:59 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-09 7:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-09 9:59 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-09 10:13 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-10 4:38 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-10 8:25 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-10 9:49 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-23 9:43 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-24 6:16 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-24 6:35 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2009-04-24 7:28 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-24 8:50 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-24 8:52 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-24 10:11 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-07 15:06 ` [PATCH] [4/4] x86: MCE: Fix EIPV behaviour with !PCC Andi Kleen
2009-04-23 9:43 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-23 20:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-24 8:35 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-24 0:27 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-24 1:11 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-24 5:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-24 8:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-24 10:30 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-24 16:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1240554911.6842.880.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®