From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756110AbZEMBDL (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 21:03:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752535AbZEMBCz (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 21:02:55 -0400 Received: from 136-022.dsl.LABridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:1716 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751980AbZEMBCz (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2009 21:02:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 8250: Don't restore NS16550 mode when console suspend is disabled From: Joe Perches To: Alan Cox Cc: Linus Torvalds , Deepak Saxena , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20090513011842.22d9cd6c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20090512210015.GA25540@plexity.net> <20090513011842.22d9cd6c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:01:33 -0700 Message-Id: <1242176493.9718.76.camel@Joe-AcerAspire> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 01:18 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Hmm. I already applied this, but then after looking closer, I undid that. > > Why? It looks buggy: > > I'm a bit suprised that as tty and serial maintainer this is the first > time I see the patch. Perhaps the MAINTAINERS entry for TTY should include file patterns? Would this be reasonable? TTY LAYER P: Alan Cox M: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org L: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: drivers/char/tty_* F: drivers/serial/serial_core.c F: linux/serial_core.h F: linux/serial.h F: linux/tty.h