From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1760095AbZEOBwN@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1760095AbZEOBwN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 14 May 2009 21:52:13 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755454AbZEOBv4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 14 May 2009 21:51:56 -0400
Received: from 136-022.dsl.LABridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:1096 "EHLO
	mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754195AbZEOBv4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 14 May 2009 21:51:56 -0400
Subject: RE: [RFC v3][PATCH 2/2] intel_txt: Intel(R) TXT and tboot kernel
 support
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@intel.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
       "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
       "arjan@linux.intel.com" <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
       "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       "andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
       "chrisw@sous-sol.org" <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
       "jbeulich@novell.com" <jbeulich@novell.com>,
       "peterm@redhat.com" <peterm@redhat.com>,
       "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@intel.com>, "Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@intel.com>,
       John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F65016F6CB04E49BFFA15D4F7B798D99B4752F3@orsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <4A03B9C3.9090607@intel.com> <20090512210154.GC23773@mit.edu>
	 <alpine.LRH.2.00.0905151006020.5527@tundra.namei.org>
	 <4F65016F6CB04E49BFFA15D4F7B798D99B4752F3@orsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:51:17 -0700
Message-Id: <1242352277.646.16.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 18:45 -0700, Cihula, Joseph wrote:
> For a balanced view [] read [] rebuttal

By definition a rebuttal is not balanced.