From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756853AbZEOTkh (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2009 15:40:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753378AbZEOTk3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2009 15:40:29 -0400 Received: from 136-022.dsl.LABridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:2208 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751257AbZEOTk2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2009 15:40:28 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] mm: Convert #ifdef DEBUG printk(KERN_DEBUG to pr_debug( From: Joe Perches To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , James Morris , David Rientjes , David Howells In-Reply-To: <20090515185602.GA28604@us.ibm.com> References: <20090515185602.GA28604@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:40:25 -0700 Message-Id: <1242416425.3373.50.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 13:56 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Seems reasonable - apart from my woes with dynamic_printk :) pr_devel instead?