From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757629AbZEQDFb (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 May 2009 23:05:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753252AbZEQDFW (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 May 2009 23:05:22 -0400 Received: from mail.crca.org.au ([67.207.131.56]:33539 "EHLO crca.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752972AbZEQDFV (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 May 2009 23:05:21 -0400 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: nigel@tuxonice.net To: Matt Price Cc: Martin Steigerwald , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, tuxonice-devel@lists.tuxonice.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <1241620755-22133-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> <200905162107.58677.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 13:06:43 +1000 Message-Id: <1242529603.10835.2.camel@nigel-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Matt et al. On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 22:53 -0400, Matt Price wrote: > one of the real frustrations i've had watching this process from the > sidelines is that those with the authority to make decisions have > never taken either of these very important concerns seriously. And > until they do, I do think it's quite likely that suspend-to-disk will > continue in its largely-broken state for quite some time to come. I just want to talk a little in defence of Rafael - I've found him really good to deal with. Yes, he has been headed in a different direction, but he's not unreasonable and he is responsive to bug reports and suggestions. Please don't think less of him than you ought. Regards, Nigel