From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752118AbZEQFBS (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 01:01:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750795AbZEQFBH (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 01:01:07 -0400 Received: from mail.crca.org.au ([67.207.131.56]:57900 "EHLO crca.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750724AbZEQFBH (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 01:01:07 -0400 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Subject: Re: [RFC] TuxOnIce From: Nigel Cunningham Reply-To: nigel@tuxonice.net To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tuxonice-devel@lists.tuxonice.net In-Reply-To: <1242532633.9691.11.camel@pasglop> References: <1241620755-22133-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> <1242532633.9691.11.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:02:30 +1000 Message-Id: <1242536550.10835.4.camel@nigel-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi. On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 13:57 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 00:38 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > I'd like to submit TuxOnIce for review, with a view to seeking to get it > > merged, perhaps in 2.6.31 or .32 (depending upon what needs work before > > it can be merged) and the willingness of those who matter. > > Might have been nicer if your RFC message actually quickly described > what TuxOnIce actually is :-) Fair enough, I suppose :). Nigel