From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754942AbZESHHJ@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754942AbZESHHJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 19 May 2009 03:07:09 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754039AbZESHGy
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 19 May 2009 03:06:54 -0400
Received: from 136-022.dsl.LABridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:2500 "EHLO
	mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754631AbZESHGx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 19 May 2009 03:06:53 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Acer Aspire One Fan Control
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Peter Feuerer <peter@piie.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, lenb@kernel.org,
       Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
       Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cone.1242715674.319169.6240.1000@arca>
References: <cone.1240858632.795110.5316.1000@onepiie>
	 <20090428072519.GA12170@liondog.tnic>
	 <1240913055.29860.14.camel@maxim-laptop>
	 <cone.1240949852.549814.7466.1000@mentalhome>
	 <1240950704.3781.12.camel@maxim-laptop>
	 <cone.1241299309.265715.3948.1000@mentalhome>
	 <20090503184617.GA3555@liondog.tnic>
	 <cone.1241648222.299676.7476.1000@mentalhome>
	 <20090509171432.GA31126@liondog.tnic>
	 <cone.1242065107.695268.13534.1000@onepiie>
	 <20090512060231.GB26286@liondog.tnic>
	 <cone.1242669880.118150.4276.1000@deskpiie>
	 <1242678032.1572.122.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
	 <cone.1242715674.319169.6240.1000@arca>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 00:06:22 -0700
Message-Id: <1242716782.28224.6.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 08:47 +0200, Peter Feuerer wrote:
> I could do that. Just curious, is there any deeper reason? Or does it just feel wrong in some matter?

No deeper reason than there's an existing source
convention that does what you need.

Might as well use it.

cheers, Joe