From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: INFO: possible circular locking dependency at cleanup_workqueue_thread
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:33:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242747203.4797.39.camel@johannes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090519120010.GA14782@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1828 bytes --]
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 14:00 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > I'm not familiar enough with the code -- but what are we really trying
> > to do in CPU_POST_DEAD? It seems to me that at that time things must
> > already be off the CPU, so ...?
>
> Yes, this cpu is dead, we should do cleanup_workqueue_thread() to kill
> cwq->thread.
>
> > On the other hand that calls
> > flush_cpu_workqueue() so it seems it would actually wait for the work to
> > be executed on some other CPU, within the CPU_POST_DEAD notification?
>
> Yes. Because we can't just kill cwq->thread, we can have the pending
> work_structs so we have to flush.
>
> Why can't we move these works to another CPU? We can, but this doesn't
> really help. Because in any case we should at least wait for
> cwq->current_work to complete.
>
> Why do we use CPU_POST_DEAD, and not (say) CPU_DEAD to flush/kill ?
> Because work->func() can sleep in get_online_cpus(), we can't flush
> until we drop cpu_hotplug.lock.
Right. But exactly this happens in the hibernate case -- the hibernate
code calls kernel/cpu.c:disable_nonboot_cpus() which calls _cpu_down()
which calls raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_POST_DEAD... Sadly,
it does so while holding the cpu_add_remove_lock, which is happens to
have the dependencies outlined in the original email...
The same happens in cpu_down() (without leading _) which you can trigger
from sysfs by manually removing the CPU, so it's not hibernate specific.
Anyway, you can have a deadlock like this:
CPU 3 CPU 2 CPU 1
suspend/hibernate
something:
rtnl_lock() device_pm_lock()
-> mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx)
mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx)
linkwatch_work
-> rtnl_lock()
disable_nonboot_cpus()
-> flush CPU 3 workqueue
johannes
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-19 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-12 7:59 Zdenek Kabelac
2009-05-17 7:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-17 10:42 ` Ming Lei
2009-05-17 11:18 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-17 13:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-18 19:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-18 20:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-18 20:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-18 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-18 22:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-19 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-19 14:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-19 8:51 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-19 12:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-19 15:33 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2009-05-19 16:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-19 16:27 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-19 18:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-22 10:46 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-22 22:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-23 8:21 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-23 23:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-24 3:29 ` Ming Lei
2009-05-24 11:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-24 12:48 ` Ming Lei
2009-05-24 19:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-24 14:30 ` Alan Stern
2009-05-24 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-20 3:36 ` Ming Lei
2009-05-20 6:47 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-20 7:09 ` Ming Lei
2009-05-20 7:12 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-20 8:21 ` Ming Lei
2009-05-20 8:45 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-22 8:03 ` Ming Lei
2009-05-22 8:11 ` Johannes Berg
2009-05-20 12:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 13:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-20 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-20 13:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-20 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-24 18:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1242747203.4797.39.camel@johannes.local \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®