From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760483AbZFKDRU (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:17:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753993AbZFKDRM (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:17:12 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:40094 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753018AbZFKDRL (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:17:11 -0400 Subject: Re: linux-next: powerpc tree build warning From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org In-Reply-To: <20090611113930.78a42893.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090611113930.78a42893.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:14:04 +1000 Message-Id: <1244690044.5739.31.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:39 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning: > > arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype:60:warning: defaults for choice values not supported > > We appear to have CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S int two places which is confusing > Kconfig. Yes, I see that. One place depends on PPC32 and the other one PPC64, but it still seems to be somewhat confused. In any case, it seems to still do the right thing, so not a big hurry here, but I'll do a patch that does it differently. Cheers, Ben.