mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: -git tree build failure #2: drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__symbol_get’
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:42:26 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244925747.5323.57.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906131309560.3237@localhost.localdomain>

On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 13:11 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > I just posted a patch for this to netdev and it was acked by its maintainer.
> > > Patch is below.
> > 
> > This solves the first build failure but there's still a second build 
> > failure:
> > 
> >  drivers/net/cnic.c: In function ‘init_bnx2_cnic’:
> >  drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__symbol_get’
> >  drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
> >  make[1]: *** [drivers/net/cnic.o] Error 1
> >  make: *** [drivers/net/cnic.o] Error 2
> > 
> > This too triggers with the config i sent. The patch below solves it 
> > - but i havent done more testing.
> > 
> > 	Ingo
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/cnic.c b/drivers/net/cnic.c
> > index 8d74037..49135cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/cnic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/cnic.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
> >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> >  #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> >  #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +
> 
> That makes no sense. 
> 
> Look at the first #include in the file - it already includes 
> <linux/module.h>.
> 
> Why do we need to do it twice?

We don't ... it's the wrong fix.  The actual problem is that
__symbol_get() is only defined for the modular case.  What it looks to
be doing is a reflection call on bnx2_cnic_probe().  I'm not sure why
it's doing this ... other than perhaps cnic wants to avoid an explicit
bnx2 dependency?  I actually think it's incorrect, since the netdev code
before it just checked bnx2 is present, so I see no harm in an explicit
call, so this should fix it.

If it had a good reason for the reflective call, then symbol_get()
without the __ should be used.

Michael Chan, could you confirm?

James

---

diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.h b/drivers/net/bnx2.h
index a1ff739..d49b6da 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.h
@@ -7345,4 +7345,6 @@ struct bnx2_rv2p_fw_file {
 
 #define HOST_VIEW_SHMEM_BASE			0x167c00
 
+struct cnic_eth_dev *bnx2_cnic_probe(struct net_device *dev);
+
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/net/cnic.c b/drivers/net/cnic.c
index 44f77eb..3db64ad 100644
--- a/drivers/net/cnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/cnic.c
@@ -2520,14 +2520,9 @@ static struct cnic_dev *init_bnx2_cnic(struct net_device *dev)
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
 	struct cnic_dev *cdev;
 	struct cnic_local *cp;
-	struct cnic_eth_dev *ethdev = NULL;
-	struct cnic_eth_dev *(*probe)(void *) = NULL;
+	struct cnic_eth_dev *ethdev;
 
-	probe = __symbol_get("bnx2_cnic_probe");
-	if (probe) {
-		ethdev = (*probe)(dev);
-		symbol_put_addr(probe);
-	}
+	ethdev = bnx2_cnic_probe(dev);
 	if (!ethdev)
 		return NULL;
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-13 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-12 18:43 -git tree build failure in drivers/net/cnic.c: undefined reference to `ip6_route_output' Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 18:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-06-12 23:51   ` David Miller
2009-06-13  0:03     ` James Bottomley
2009-06-13  0:05       ` David Miller
2009-06-13 14:37         ` James Bottomley
2009-06-13  6:42       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13  7:03         ` Michael Chan
2009-06-13  6:29   ` -git tree build failure #2: drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__symbol_get’ Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 20:11     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-13 20:31       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 20:35         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 20:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 20:42       ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-06-14  0:43         ` Michael Chan
2009-06-14  1:33           ` James Bottomley
2009-06-14  2:18             ` Michael Chan
2009-06-14 14:15               ` James Bottomley
2009-06-14 14:51                 ` -git tree build failure #2: drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: error: implicit declaration of function '__symbol_get' Michael Chan
2009-06-15  1:27             ` -git tree build failure #2: drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__symbol_get’ Mike Christie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1244925747.5323.57.camel@mulgrave.site \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®