From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: -git tree build failure #2: drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__symbol_get’
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:42:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244925747.5323.57.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906131309560.3237@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 13:11 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > I just posted a patch for this to netdev and it was acked by its maintainer.
> > > Patch is below.
> >
> > This solves the first build failure but there's still a second build
> > failure:
> >
> > drivers/net/cnic.c: In function ‘init_bnx2_cnic’:
> > drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__symbol_get’
> > drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
> > make[1]: *** [drivers/net/cnic.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [drivers/net/cnic.o] Error 2
> >
> > This too triggers with the config i sent. The patch below solves it
> > - but i havent done more testing.
> >
> > Ingo
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/cnic.c b/drivers/net/cnic.c
> > index 8d74037..49135cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/cnic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/cnic.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
> > #include <linux/delay.h>
> > #include <linux/ethtool.h>
> > #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +
>
> That makes no sense.
>
> Look at the first #include in the file - it already includes
> <linux/module.h>.
>
> Why do we need to do it twice?
We don't ... it's the wrong fix. The actual problem is that
__symbol_get() is only defined for the modular case. What it looks to
be doing is a reflection call on bnx2_cnic_probe(). I'm not sure why
it's doing this ... other than perhaps cnic wants to avoid an explicit
bnx2 dependency? I actually think it's incorrect, since the netdev code
before it just checked bnx2 is present, so I see no harm in an explicit
call, so this should fix it.
If it had a good reason for the reflective call, then symbol_get()
without the __ should be used.
Michael Chan, could you confirm?
James
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2.h b/drivers/net/bnx2.h
index a1ff739..d49b6da 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.h
@@ -7345,4 +7345,6 @@ struct bnx2_rv2p_fw_file {
#define HOST_VIEW_SHMEM_BASE 0x167c00
+struct cnic_eth_dev *bnx2_cnic_probe(struct net_device *dev);
+
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/net/cnic.c b/drivers/net/cnic.c
index 44f77eb..3db64ad 100644
--- a/drivers/net/cnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/cnic.c
@@ -2520,14 +2520,9 @@ static struct cnic_dev *init_bnx2_cnic(struct net_device *dev)
struct pci_dev *pdev;
struct cnic_dev *cdev;
struct cnic_local *cp;
- struct cnic_eth_dev *ethdev = NULL;
- struct cnic_eth_dev *(*probe)(void *) = NULL;
+ struct cnic_eth_dev *ethdev;
- probe = __symbol_get("bnx2_cnic_probe");
- if (probe) {
- ethdev = (*probe)(dev);
- symbol_put_addr(probe);
- }
+ ethdev = bnx2_cnic_probe(dev);
if (!ethdev)
return NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-13 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 18:43 -git tree build failure in drivers/net/cnic.c: undefined reference to `ip6_route_output' Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 18:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-06-12 23:51 ` David Miller
2009-06-13 0:03 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-13 0:05 ` David Miller
2009-06-13 14:37 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-13 6:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 7:03 ` Michael Chan
2009-06-13 6:29 ` -git tree build failure #2: drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__symbol_get’ Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 20:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-13 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 20:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 20:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-13 20:42 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-06-14 0:43 ` Michael Chan
2009-06-14 1:33 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-14 2:18 ` Michael Chan
2009-06-14 14:15 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-14 14:51 ` -git tree build failure #2: drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: error: implicit declaration of function '__symbol_get' Michael Chan
2009-06-15 1:27 ` -git tree build failure #2: drivers/net/cnic.c:2520: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__symbol_get’ Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244925747.5323.57.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®