From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756827AbZFWXiO (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:38:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755155AbZFWXh7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:37:59 -0400 Received: from 136-022.dsl.LABridge.com ([206.117.136.22]:3586 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753277AbZFWXh6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:37:58 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch 3/6] ide: always kill the whole request on error From: Joe Perches To: David Miller Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, petkovbb@gmail.com, htejun@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20090623.161904.177489795.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200906232327.27610.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090623.161904.177489795.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:37:54 -0700 Message-Id: <1245800274.29098.75.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 16:19 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:27:27 +0200 > > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > Subject: [PATCH] ide: always kill the whole request on error > > --- a/drivers/ide/ide-eh.c > > +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-eh.c > > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static inline void ide_complete_drive_re > > if (rq && blk_special_request(rq) && rq->cmd[0] == REQ_DRIVE_RESET) { > > if (err <= 0 && rq->errors == 0) > > rq->errors = -EIO; > > - ide_complete_rq(drive, err ? err : 0, ide_rq_bytes(rq)); > > + ide_complete_rq(drive, err ? err : 0, blk_rq_bytes(rq)); Doesn't that "err ? err : 0" look odd? Why not just err?