Em Sáb, 2009-06-27 às 02:04 +0100, Mark Brown escreveu:
> > +	if (vreg->n_voltages == 1)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> It'd be a little more friendly to check if the supported voltage is in
> the requested range.  However, that'd only be an issue if constraints
> allowed voltage changes which is obviously broken so a comment to that
> effect would be enough.  I wouldn't have mentioned it but...

Ok, I will add a comment.

> > +	ezx_pcap_read(pcap, vreg->reg, &tmp);
> > +	tmp |= (1 << vreg->en);
> > +	ezx_pcap_write(pcap, vreg->reg, tmp);
> 
> This read/modify/write cycle is racy; the individual regulator is locked
> by the core but this register is shared between all regulators on the
> chip so if two are being updated at once things will go wrong.  Most of
> the MFDs have a set_bits() function that does an atomic read/modify/write
> cycle for cases like this.

Good point, thanks! :)

-- 
Daniel Ribeiro