mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	git-commits-head@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Exiting with locks still held (was Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: Fix scheduling-while-atomic bug)
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:48:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246538899.13320.86.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090701110438.GA15958@elte.hu>

Hi Ingo,

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 13:04 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > Since we are at locking, I just noticed this on my x86 laptop when
> > running cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak (I haven't got it on an ARM
> > board):
> > 
> > ================================================
> > [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > cat/3687 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
> > 1 lock held by cat/3687:
> > #0:  (scan_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c01e0c5c>] kmemleak_open+0x3c/0x70
> > 
> > kmemleak_open() acquires scan_mutex and unconditionally releases 
> > it in kmemleak_release(). The mutex seems to be released as a 
> > subsequent acquiring works fine.
> > 
> > Is this caused just because cat may have exited without closing 
> > the file descriptor (which should be done automatically anyway)?
> 
> This lockdep warning has a 0% false positives track record so far: 
> all previous cases it triggered showed some real (and fatal) bug in 
> the underlying code.

In this particular case, there is no fatal problem as the mutex is
released shortly after this message.

> The above one probably means scan_mutex is leaked out of a /proc 
> syscall - that would be a bug in kmemleak.

It could be but I can't figure out a solution. If there is only one task
opening and closing the kmemleak file, everything is fine. In
combination with shell piping I think I get the kmemleak file descriptor
released from a different task than the one that opened it.

For example, the badly written code below opens kmemleak and acquires
the scan_mutex in the parent task but releases it in the child (it needs
a few tries to trigger it). With waitpid() in parent everything is fine.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>

int main(void)
{
	int fd = open("/sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak", O_RDONLY);

	printf("fd = %d\n", fd);
	if (fd < 0)
		return 2;

	if (!fork()) {
		/* child */
		sleep(2);
		close(fd);
		printf("fd closed in child\n");
	}

	return 0;
}

Running this gives (the ### lines are printed in the
kmemleak_open/release functions):

# ./cat-kmemleak
### kmemleak_open current->pid = 1409
fd = 3
=====================================
[ BUG: lock held at task exit time! ]
-------------------------------------
cat-kmemleak/1409 is exiting with locks still held!
1 lock held by cat-kmemleak/1409:
 #0:  (scan_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c00662b1>] kmemleak_open+0x31/0x68

stack backtrace:
[<c0024025>] (unwind_backtrace+0x1/0x80) from [<c01cddd7>] (dump_stack+0xb/0xc)
[<c01cddd7>] (dump_stack+0xb/0xc) from [<c0043d2d>] (debug_check_no_locks_held+0x49/0x64)
[<c0043d2d>] (debug_check_no_locks_held+0x49/0x64) from [<c0031423>] (do_exit+0x3fb/0x43c)
[<c0031423>] (do_exit+0x3fb/0x43c) from [<c00314c5>] (do_group_exit+0x61/0x80)
[<c00314c5>] (do_group_exit+0x61/0x80) from [<c00314f3>] (sys_exit_group+0xf/0x14)
[<c00314f3>] (sys_exit_group+0xf/0x14) from [<c001fc41>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x1/0x40)

### kmemleak_release current->pid = 1410
fd closed in child


Any suggestions? Thanks.

-- 
Catalin


  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-02 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200907010300.n6130rRf026194@hera.kernel.org>
2009-07-01  7:53 ` [PATCH] kmemleak: Fix scheduling-while-atomic bug Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01  8:10   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-01  9:18   ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-01  9:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01  9:46       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-01 11:04         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-02 12:48           ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2009-07-02 12:54             ` Exiting with locks still held (was Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: Fix scheduling-while-atomic bug) Pekka Enberg
2009-07-02 13:06               ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-02 14:13               ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-02 17:39                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-03 10:18                   ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-03  7:04             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-02  9:48       ` [PATCH] kmemleak: Fix scheduling-while-atomic bug Catalin Marinas
2009-07-03  7:00         ` [PATCH] kmemleak: Mark nice +10 Ingo Molnar
2009-07-03  8:09           ` Catalin Marinas
2009-07-08 13:33       ` [PATCH] kmemleak: Fix scheduling-while-atomic bug Catalin Marinas
2009-08-23  2:48         ` Ming Lei
2009-08-23 14:59           ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-24  0:10             ` Ming Lei
2009-08-24 10:02               ` ACPI scheduling while atomic (was: Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: Fix scheduling-while-atomic bug) Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1246538899.13320.86.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=git-commits-head@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome