From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Janboe Ye <yuan-bo.ye@motorola.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vegard.nossum@gmail.com,
graydon@redhat.com, fche@redhat.com, cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Check write to slab memory which freed already using mudflap
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:46:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247219189.771.19.camel@penberg-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907100233560.14601@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Hi David,
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 02:41 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> The reason why I'd like to see slqb merged as a non-default alternative is
> because it exposes the allocator to more benchmarking coverage than would
> be possible in any other environment and attracts much more attention to
> development for those who don't pull Pekka's tree directly.
Yes, we can do that. But I'm not going to ask Linus to pull something
that has known _boot-time_ bugs (that we haven't been able to figure out
in over three months!) because it's a pretty clear indication that we're
not on top of things yet.
So if you want to fast-track SLQB, feel free to help out Nick in
debugging that sucker ;).
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-10 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-09 16:13 Janboe Ye
2009-07-09 16:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-09 19:40 ` Janboe Ye
2009-07-10 8:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-10 8:52 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-10 9:03 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-10 9:14 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-10 9:29 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-10 9:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-10 9:47 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-10 9:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-10 10:03 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-10 10:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-10 10:30 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-15 14:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-15 20:19 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-20 8:32 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-10 9:41 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-10 9:46 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2009-07-10 9:04 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-10 9:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-10 9:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-07-10 9:31 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-10 9:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-10 18:55 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247219189.771.19.camel@penberg-laptop \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=graydon@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=yuan-bo.ye@motorola.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®