From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [FIX REQUEST] Processor ID should be unsigned int
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:44:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247300092.2678.17.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
Hello all,
In whole kernel, Processor ID is inconsistent at some places used as int
and some places as unsigned int and unsigned.
As I spotted earlier in X86: smp.h same structure is using all three
types.
Do you think there should be some consistency.
Thanks,
--
JSR
reply other threads:[~2009-07-11 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247300092.2678.17.camel@ht.satnam \
--to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome