From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kmemleak: Early log buffer exceeded
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:53:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1247763217.27689.36.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1247678232.2429.11.camel@ht.satnam>
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 22:47 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Currently this reporting seems not very impressive and not giving much
> useful information :
>
> kmemleak: Early log buffer exceeded
> kmemleak: Kernel memory leak detector disabled
>
> It should be something like this because it is an error and this will
> disable Kernel memory leak detector :
>
> [ 0.000173] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.000186] WARNING: at mm/kmemleak.c:726 log_early+0x39/0xa9()
> [ 0.000189] Hardware name:
> [ 0.000192] Early log buffer exceeded, please increase DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE
> [ 0.000195] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.000202] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.31-rc3 #51
> [ 0.000206] Call Trace:
> [ 0.000216] [<c102cf74>] warn_slowpath_common+0x60/0x90
> [ 0.000222] [<c102cfd8>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
> [ 0.000227] [<c109614b>] log_early+0x39/0xa9
> [ 0.000232] [<c109682d>] kmemleak_alloc+0x41/0x4c
> [ 0.000241] [<c1093b63>] __kmalloc+0xcb/0x153
> [ 0.000247] [<c1093c04>] alloc_arraycache+0x19/0x50
> [ 0.000253] [<c1093e44>] do_tune_cpucache+0x209/0x35d
> [ 0.000259] [<c10940ee>] enable_cpucache+0x58/0x9a
> [ 0.000267] [<c14bc6e5>] kmem_cache_init_late+0x21/0xc2
> [ 0.000274] [<c14a8a20>] start_kernel+0x1e5/0x2ba
> [ 0.000280] [<c14a8340>] i386_start_kernel+0x6a/0x6f
> [ 0.000380] ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]---
> [ 0.000384] kmemleak: Kernel memory leak detector disabled
I'm OK with mentioning DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE but the stack trace
is not relevant here, it can happen in any place which allocates some
memory.
> Currently default value of DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE is 400 which
> can be easily exceed-able if debugging is on.
That's why I made it configurable. We can indeed set it to a higher
value but that's after 2.6.31. I have a patch in to mark this buffer as
__initdata so that it is freed.
> These issues can be fixed like this :
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 12327b2..2eaf8bc 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -362,14 +362,15 @@ config DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
> config DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE
> int "Maximum kmemleak early log entries"
> depends on DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
> - range 200 2000
> - default 400
> + range 256 2048
> + default 512
The power of 2 boundaries is not relevant as this represents the number
of elements in an array rather than a size in bytes.
> help
> Kmemleak must track all the memory allocations to avoid
> reporting false positives. Since memory may be allocated or
> freed before kmemleak is initialised, an early log buffer is
> - used to store these actions. If kmemleak reports "early log
> - buffer exceeded", please increase this value.
> + used to store these actions. You need to increase this value,
> + if kmemleak reports "Early log buffer exceeded, please increase
> + DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE".
>
> config DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST
> tristate "Simple test for the kernel memory leak detector"
> diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> index 5aabd41..084e927 100644
> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> @@ -722,7 +722,8 @@ static void log_early(int op_type, const void *ptr, size_t size,
> struct early_log *log;
>
> if (crt_early_log >= ARRAY_SIZE(early_log)) {
> - pr_warning("Early log buffer exceeded\n");
> + WARN_ONCE(1, KERN_ERR "Early log buffer exceeded, "
> + "please increase DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE\n");
> kmemleak_disable();
> return;
> }
As I said above, I wouldn't want a stack trace here. Initially, this
code called kmemleak_panic() but changed it since the stack trace isn't
relevant.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-16 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-15 17:17 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-07-16 16:53 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-23 22:10 Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-06-23 21:26 Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-06-24 9:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-06-24 10:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2009-06-24 13:18 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1247763217.27689.36.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®