From: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
To: trivial@kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] trivial: Fix stale definition of file-nr in documentation
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:37:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248863857-5629-1-git-send-email-dfeng@redhat.com> (raw)
commit 760df9 merged /proc/sys/fs documentation in Documentation/sysctl/
fs.txt and Documentation/filesystem/proc.txt, but stale file-nr definition
is remained. This patch add back the right fs-nr definition for 2.6 kernel.
Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng<dfeng@redhat.com>
---
Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt b/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt
index 1458448..6268250 100644
--- a/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt
+++ b/Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt
@@ -96,13 +96,16 @@ handles that the Linux kernel will allocate. When you get lots
of error messages about running out of file handles, you might
want to increase this limit.
-The three values in file-nr denote the number of allocated
-file handles, the number of unused file handles and the maximum
-number of file handles. When the allocated file handles come
-close to the maximum, but the number of unused file handles is
-significantly greater than 0, you've encountered a peak in your
-usage of file handles and you don't need to increase the maximum.
-
+Historically, the three values in file-nr denoted the number of
+allocated file handles, the number of allocated but unused file
+handles, and the maximum number of file handles. Linux 2.6 always
+reports 0 as the number of free file handles -- this is not an
+error, it just means that the number of allocated file handles
+exactly matches the number of used file handles.
+
+Attempts to allocate more file descriptors than file-max are
+reported with printk, look for "VFS: file-max limit <number>
+reached".
==============================================================
nr_open:
--
1.6.2.5
reply other threads:[~2009-07-29 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248863857-5629-1-git-send-email-dfeng@redhat.com \
--to=dfeng@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome