From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
To: <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, msr: unify rdmsr_on_cpus/wrmsr_on_cpus
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:10:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1248945002-2931-2-git-send-email-borislav.petkov@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A7099E8.30003@zytor.com>
Since rdmsr_on_cpus and wrmsr_on_cpus are almost identical, unify them
into a common __rwmsr_on_cpus helper thus avoiding code duplication.
While at it, convert cpumask_t's to const struct cpumask *.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
---
This one is .32 material.
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 4 +-
arch/x86/lib/msr.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 48ad9d2..f2f4309 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -224,8 +224,8 @@ do { \
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int rdmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h);
int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h);
-void rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs);
-void wrmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs);
+void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs);
+void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs);
int rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 *l, u32 *h);
int wrmsr_safe_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h);
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/msr.c b/arch/x86/lib/msr.c
index caa24ac..2f26cf4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/msr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/msr.c
@@ -71,14 +71,9 @@ int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpu);
-/* rdmsr on a bunch of CPUs
- *
- * @mask: which CPUs
- * @msr_no: which MSR
- * @msrs: array of MSR values
- *
- */
-void rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+static void __rwmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no,
+ struct msr *msrs,
+ void (*msr_func) (void *info))
{
struct msr_info rv;
int this_cpu;
@@ -92,11 +87,23 @@ void rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
this_cpu = get_cpu();
if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
- __rdmsr_on_cpu(&rv);
+ msr_func(&rv);
- smp_call_function_many(mask, __rdmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
+ smp_call_function_many(mask, msr_func, &rv, 1);
put_cpu();
}
+
+/* rdmsr on a bunch of CPUs
+ *
+ * @mask: which CPUs
+ * @msr_no: which MSR
+ * @msrs: array of MSR values
+ *
+ */
+void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+{
+ __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __rdmsr_on_cpu);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpus);
/*
@@ -107,24 +114,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdmsr_on_cpus);
* @msrs: array of MSR values
*
*/
-void wrmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
+void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask, u32 msr_no, struct msr *msrs)
{
- struct msr_info rv;
- int this_cpu;
-
- memset(&rv, 0, sizeof(rv));
-
- rv.off = cpumask_first(mask);
- rv.msrs = msrs;
- rv.msr_no = msr_no;
-
- this_cpu = get_cpu();
-
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
- __wrmsr_on_cpu(&rv);
-
- smp_call_function_many(mask, __wrmsr_on_cpu, &rv, 1);
- put_cpu();
+ __rwmsr_on_cpus(mask, msr_no, msrs, __wrmsr_on_cpu);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(wrmsr_on_cpus);
--
1.6.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-30 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-06 14:29 [PATCH] [x86, msr]: remove code duplication Borislav Petkov
2009-07-06 21:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-07 10:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-07-07 15:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-08 11:19 ` [PATCH] [x86, msr]: execute on the correct CPU subset (was: Re: [PATCH] [x86, msr]: remove code duplication) Borislav Petkov
2009-07-16 16:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-07-16 17:24 ` [PATCH] [x86, msr]: execute on the correct CPU subset H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-27 20:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-28 10:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-07-29 16:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-07-29 17:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-29 18:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-07-29 18:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-29 18:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-07-29 18:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-07-30 9:10 ` [PATCH] x86, msr: " Borislav Petkov
2009-07-30 9:10 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2009-09-14 12:55 ` [PATCH] x86, msr: unify rdmsr_on_cpus/wrmsr_on_cpus Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1248945002-2931-2-git-send-email-borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--to=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome