From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932980AbZHEBFX (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:05:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932792AbZHEBFV (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:05:21 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:35439 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932632AbZHEBFT (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:05:19 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,325,1246863600"; d="scan'208";a="713960588" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Generic sysfs support for ACPI ALS and other ALS devices From: Zhang Rui To: Greg KH Cc: "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" , Pavel Machek , linux-acpi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Len Brown , Richard Purdie , Matthew Garrett In-Reply-To: <20090804173627.GA23848@kroah.com> References: <1249290657.2670.250.camel@rzhang-dt> <20090804132129.GH18974@elf.ucw.cz> <20090804151042.GA20276@kroah.com> <19631.1249406664@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20090804173627.GA23848@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:04:52 +0800 Message-Id: <1249434292.2670.388.camel@rzhang-dt> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 (2.22.1-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 01:36 +0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:24:24PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:10:42 PDT, Greg KH said: > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:21:29PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > On Mon 2009-08-03 17:10:57, Zhang Rui wrote: > > > > > > > cat /sys/class/als/als0/mappings > > > > > ???Illuminance Adjustment > > > > > 0 70 > > > > > 10 73 > > > > > 80 85 > > > > > 300 100 > > > > > 1000 150 > > > > > > > > There's one value per file for sysfs... You should definitely have the > > > > header. > > > > > > No, no "header", just don't do this, it's not allowed. Again, > > > one-value-per-sysfs-file is the rule, please do not violate it. > > > > What's the intended sysfs solution here, then? Make 'mappings' a directory, > > and populate it with files called 0, 10, 80, 300, 1000, each with one number > > in them? > > That's one acceptable solution. Or how about files in this directory > called "mapping_0", "mapping_10", and so on, containing the adjustment > value? > great. that's what I'm going to do. refreshed patch will be sent out later. :) thanks, rui