From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: kmemcheck in linux-next causes NULL pointer dereference at task_rq_lock
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:51:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1249933887.2501.62.camel@dhcp231-106.rdu.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0908101156x2bc92b22ud1748abb153800fb@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 20:56 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> 2009/8/10 Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>:
> > I'm using 2.6.31-rc5-next-20090810 on a vmware server. Originally I saw
> > messages about setting to one cpu, so I booted with maxcpu=1. I get
> > this same panic with and without maxpu. Booting with kmemcheck=0 boots
> > just fine.
> >
> > I have not tested kmemcheck in linus' tree but will start looking for a
> > working version now. Any suggestions or things I should try?
>
> Hi, thanks for the report, and for trying it out.
>
> Does it crash with "kmemcheck=0 maxcpus=1" (it should be maxcpus, not
> maxcpu). This should be a simple way of determining whether it was
> kmemcheck or the existing maxcpus code, which we use, that broke.
I boots fine with kmemcheck=0
I did get the command line right. maxcpus=1 kmemcheck=1 was the panic I
showed in the last message.
> If you can send config (off-list, probably), I will try to reproduce
> and investigate more tomorrow.
Will send it now.
Thanks.
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-10 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-10 17:35 Eric Paris
2009-08-10 18:56 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-08-10 19:51 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2009-08-21 17:20 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-08-21 18:04 ` Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1249933887.2501.62.camel@dhcp231-106.rdu.redhat.com \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®