From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH, RFC] ext3: Update Kconfig description of EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:03:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1249934623-15939-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> (raw)
The old description for this configuration option was perhaps not
completely balanced in terms of describing the tradeoffs of using a
default of data=writeback vs. data=ordered. Despite the fact that old
description very strongly recomended disabling this feature, all of
the major distributions have elected to preserve the existing 'legacy'
default, which is a strong hint that it perhaps wasn't telling the
whole story.
This revised description has been vetted by a number of ext3
developers as being better at informing the user about the tradeoffs
of enabling or disabling this configuration feature.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
---
fs/ext3/Kconfig | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/Kconfig b/fs/ext3/Kconfig
index fb3c1a2..522b154 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/ext3/Kconfig
@@ -29,23 +29,25 @@ config EXT3_FS
module will be called ext3.
config EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED
- bool "Default to 'data=ordered' in ext3 (legacy option)"
+ bool "Default to 'data=ordered' in ext3"
depends on EXT3_FS
help
- If a filesystem does not explicitly specify a data ordering
- mode, and the journal capability allowed it, ext3 used to
- historically default to 'data=ordered'.
-
- That was a rather unfortunate choice, because it leads to all
- kinds of latency problems, and the 'data=writeback' mode is more
- appropriate these days.
-
- You should probably always answer 'n' here, and if you really
- want to use 'data=ordered' mode, set it in the filesystem itself
- with 'tune2fs -o journal_data_ordered'.
-
- But if you really want to enable the legacy default, you can do
- so by answering 'y' to this question.
+ The journal mode options for ext3 have different tradeoffs
+ between when data is guaranteed to be on disk and
+ performance. The use of "data=writeback" can cause
+ unwritten data to appear in files after an system crash or
+ power failure, which can be a security issue. However,
+ "data=ordered" mode can also result in major performance
+ problems, including seconds-long delays before an fsync()
+ call returns. For details, see:
+
+ http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext3_data_mode_tradeoffs
+
+ If you have been historically happy with ext3's performance,
+ data=ordered mode will be a safe choice and you should
+ answer 'y' here. If you understand the reliability and data
+ privacy issues of data=writeback and are willing to make
+ that trade off, answer 'n'.
config EXT3_FS_XATTR
bool "Ext3 extended attributes"
--
1.6.3.2.1.gb9f7d.dirty
next reply other threads:[~2009-08-10 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-10 20:03 Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2009-08-10 20:28 ` Jan Kara
2009-08-10 20:55 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-08-11 3:49 ` Al Boldi
2009-08-11 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2009-08-11 11:41 ` Al Boldi
2009-08-11 13:35 ` What happened to data=guarded? (was: ext3: Update Kconfig description of EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED) Frans Pop
2009-08-11 13:37 ` Chris Mason
2009-08-11 14:54 ` What happened to data=guarded? Frans Pop
2009-08-11 15:29 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-11 15:34 ` Jan Kara
2009-08-11 18:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-08-11 18:57 ` Theodore Tso
2009-08-10 16:42 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-11 22:00 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2009-08-12 20:37 ` Jan Kara
2009-08-11 19:09 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1249934623-15939-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®