From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754522AbZHMNis@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754522AbZHMNis (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:38:48 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753857AbZHMNir
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:38:47 -0400
Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([193.131.176.58]:36631 "EHLO
	cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752467AbZHMNir (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:38:47 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM
	sections
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
       Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
       Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
       linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
       David John <davidjon@xenontk.org>, Erik Mouw <mouw@nl.linux.org>,
       kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20090813115444.GB10450@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1249948147.8895.96.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
	 <20090812115520.GI24339@elf.ucw.cz>
	 <20090812194838.GB12117@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	 <84144f020908121317g64551a2cu1b960f44ed5d0d9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20090812212502.GA24667@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	 <20090813103511.2928a085@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
	 <20090813094736.GZ6132@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	 <1250158593.28285.23.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
	 <20090813103513.GC6132@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	 <1250161714.28285.61.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
	 <20090813115444.GB10450@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: ARM Ltd
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:33:44 +0100
Message-Id: <1250170424.14019.3.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Aug 2009 13:33:45.0592 (UTC) FILETIME=[AE815780:01CA1C1A]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 12:54 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 04:08:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 11:35 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > And... have your emails been held for moderation recently?
> > 
> > Umm... (while chuckling)
> 
> Yes.  The reason being is you removed the 'Re:' from the subject
> line but still pressed "reply".

I think this rule should be changed to at least allow [PATCH] subjects.
This helps when posting a series of patches as replies to a cover mail
(otherwise I either post them as unrelated or hope that Erik isn't on
holiday for a few weeks :-)).

BTW, do you have any statistics on how many posts you reject because of
this rule?

-- 
Catalin