From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S932570AbZHURFU@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932570AbZHURFU (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:05:20 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932397AbZHURFT
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:05:19 -0400
Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1073 "EHLO mail.perches.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932068AbZHURFT (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:05:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Mailing lists have moved
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
       Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, vince@kyllikki.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm@vger.kernel.org,
       torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
In-Reply-To: <1250872415.3311.206.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
References: <1250855566.3311.100.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908210925400.24646@utopia.booyaka.com>
	 <1250868957.3311.110.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
	 <4A8EBFFD.5000307@billgatliff.com>
	 <1250870971.3311.173.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
	 <4A8EC75D.6010203@billgatliff.com>
	 <1250872415.3311.206.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:05:18 -0700
Message-Id: <1250874318.29546.85.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:33 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 11:12 -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> > So help me understand what is the vger list for?  :)
> it's for those who want to discuss ARM Linux without
> involving Russell in any way. That _also_ hasn't changed.

I don't have a preference for that, but I do have
a preference for lists without arbitrary latencies
for manual moderation.