From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Trace event testing time - 3s to 41s
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:28:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252942130.2964.148.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7848160909130815l3e768a30n3b28808bbe5c254b@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 11:15 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> Somewhere between -rc9 and yesterday's git, my desktop went from using
> 3s worth of trace event testing time to 41s !
>
> It looks like we not only added a whole bunch of tracing points but
> also are doing the tests twice post -rc9 - the addition being testing
> with function tracer.
>
> grep "Testing event" dmesg.31rc9 |wc -l
> 100
>
> grep "Testing event" dmesg.31git |wc -l
> 1172
This was due to the fact that we test every syscall now.
>
> While one could get away with "don't enable that config option then"
> response, for testing kernels daily this sounds like it is going to be
> very annoying as it adds a considerable boot lag.
>
> So I was thinking could we move this testing to a kthread with idle
> priority or something - may be disabling tracing until those tests are
> finished, if that sort of thing is necessary?
> Or does it need to happen synchronous to booting?
I don't have time at the moment, but I would not mind moving the syscall
testing to a thread. Heck, that way we can actually test syscalls
too ;-)
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-14 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-13 15:15 Parag Warudkar
2009-09-14 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-09-17 7:47 ` [tip:tracing/core] tracing: make testing syscall events a separate configuration tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1252942130.2964.148.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome