mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Trace event testing time - 3s to 41s
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:28:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1252942130.2964.148.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7848160909130815l3e768a30n3b28808bbe5c254b@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 11:15 -0400, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> Somewhere between -rc9 and yesterday's git, my desktop went from using
> 3s worth of trace event testing time to 41s !
> 
> It looks like we not only added a whole bunch of tracing points but
> also are doing the tests twice post -rc9 - the addition being testing
> with function tracer.
> 
> grep "Testing event" dmesg.31rc9 |wc -l
> 100
> 
> grep "Testing event" dmesg.31git |wc -l
> 1172

This was due to the fact that we test every syscall now.

> 
> While one could get away with "don't enable that config option then"
> response, for testing kernels daily this sounds like it is going to be
> very annoying as it adds a considerable boot lag.
> 
> So I was thinking could we move this testing to a kthread with idle
> priority or something - may be disabling tracing until those tests are
> finished, if that sort of thing is necessary?
> Or does it need to happen synchronous to booting?

I don't have time at the moment, but I would not mind moving the syscall
testing to a thread. Heck, that way we can actually test syscalls
too ;-)

-- Steve



  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-14 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-13 15:15 Parag Warudkar
2009-09-14 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-09-17  7:47 ` [tip:tracing/core] tracing: make testing syscall events a separate configuration tip-bot for Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1252942130.2964.148.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=srostedt@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome